Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

8.5K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
8.5K
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

11.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
11.7K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.0K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.0K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

11.8K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
11.8K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

1.4K
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
1.4K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

10.2K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
10.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emerging organic pollutants in sediments from Lake Victoria: Spatial patterns, sources and ecological risks.

The Science of the total environment·2026
Same author

Predicting the sound-induced flash illusion: A time-window-of-integration approach.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Measuring Multisensory Integration in Reaction Time: Relative Entropy Approach.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Assessing the chemical burden of the North-East Atlantic ecosystem through targeted and untargeted HRMS-based approaches.

Journal of hazardous materials·2025
Same author

Comprehensive characterization of European house dust contaminants: Concentrations and profiles, geographical variability, and implications for chemical regulation and health risk.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

Network analysis to reveal the most commonly detected compounds in predator-prey pairs in freshwater and marine mammals and fish in Europe.

The Science of the total environment·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Sequential sampling model for multiattribute choice alternatives with random attention time and processing order.

Adele Diederich1, Peter Oswald2

  • 1Cognitive Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jacobs University Bremen, Germany.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|September 25, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The multiattribute attention switching (MAAS) model simulates choice behavior by modeling how attention shifts between attributes. This model explains choice probabilities and response times, including complex patterns like preference reversals.

Keywords:
Ornstein-UhlenbeckWienerattention timefinite time horizonmultiattributeorder schedulesequential samplingtime schedule

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Mathematical Modeling

Background:

  • Understanding multiattribute binary choice is crucial in decision science.
  • Existing models often simplify the dynamic attention allocation process during deliberation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and investigate the Multiattribute Attention Switching (MAAS) model for multiattribute binary choice.
  • To explore how attribute consideration order and attention time influence choice probabilities and response times.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a sequential sampling model (MAAS) with separate sampling processes for each attribute.
  • Investigated various probability distributions for attention time and their variances.
  • Analyzed the impact of finite versus infinite decision horizons on the last considered attribute.

Main Results:

  • The MAAS model predicts a rich pattern of choice probabilities and response times, including preference reversals and fast errors.
  • Attribute consideration order and attention duration significantly impact predicted outcomes.
  • A finite decision horizon can lead to a non-zero probability of not making a decision within the available time.

Conclusions:

  • The MAAS model provides a flexible framework for understanding complex choice dynamics.
  • Attention switching and time allocation are key factors in multiattribute decision-making.
  • The model's predictions hold for both Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Wiener processes.