Self-reported pediatric measures of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and strength impact for PROMIS: item

Carole A Tucker1, Katherine B Bevans, Rachel E Teneralli

  • 1Department of Physical Therapy (Dr Tucker), College of Health Professions and Social Work, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pediatrics (Dr Bevans, Ms Teneralli, and Dr Forrest), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pediatrics (Drs Bevans and Forrest), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (Drs Smith and Bowles), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Insights

Researchers developed new questionnaires to assess children's physical activity, sedentary behaviors, and strengthening activities. These tools were created using qualitative methods to ensure children aged 8-18 understand the questions.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Health
  • Behavioral Science
  • Measurement Science

Background:

  • Assessing children's activity levels in clinical research is crucial but lacks rigorous tools.
  • Existing pediatric self-report measures for activity are scarce.
  • Qualitative methods were employed to enhance pediatric activity assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To improve pediatric activity self-report measures.
  • To develop comprehensive item pools for assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior, and strengthening activities in children.
  • To create child-friendly assessment tools.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative methods including conceptual framework development were used.
  • Cognitive interviews and comprehensibility reviews were conducted.
  • Items were refined to ensure child comprehension.

Main Results:

  • 129 unique items were generated across physical activities (80), sedentary behaviors (23), and strengthening activities (26).
  • The items were found to be comprehensible for children aged 8 to 18 years.
  • Four items were deleted after comprehensibility review.

Conclusions:

  • The developed item pools accurately reflect children's understanding of activity concepts.
  • These pools will be calibrated using item response theory.
  • The goal is to support computer-adaptive testing for self- and proxy-reported outcomes.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos