Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation

To evaluate the influence of the scanning orientation on diagnostic performance measured by the mean elasticity, maximum elasticity, and fat-to-lesion elasticity ratio on ultrasound-based shear wave elastography in differentiating breast cancers from benign lesions.

In this study, a total of 260 breast masses from 235 consecutive patients were observed from March 2012 to November 2012. For each lesion, the mean elasticity value, maximum elasticity value, and fat-to-lesion ratio were measured along two orthogonal directions, and all values were compared with pathologic results.

There were 59 malignant and 201 benign lesions. Malignant masses showed higher mean elasticity, maximum elasticity, and fat-to-lesion ratio values than benign lesions (P < .0001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were as follows: average mean elasticity on both views, 0.870; mean elasticity on the transverse view, 0.866; maximum elasticity on both views, 0.865; maximum elasticity on the transverse view, 0.864; mean elasticity on the longitudinal view, 0.849; fat-to-lesion ratio on both views, 0.849; maximum elasticity on the longitudinal view, 0.845; fat-to-lesion ratio on the transverse view, 0.841; and fat-to-lesion ratio on the longitudinal view, 0.814. Intraclass correlation coefficients for agreement between the scanning directions were as follows: mean elasticity, 0.852; maximum elasticity, 0.842; fat-to-lesion ratio, 0.746, for masses; and mean elasticity, 0.392, for anterior mammary fat.

Mean elasticity, maximum elasticity, and fat-to-lesion elasticity ratio values were helpful in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. The scanning orientation did not significantly affect the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography for breast masses.