Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Condylar asymmetry in different occlusion types.
Adolescent patients with unilateral posterior crossbite (UPC) exhibit significantly different condylar height asymmetry. Early correction of UPC may prevent future skeletal mandibular asymmetries.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics and Dental Anthropology
- Craniofacial Development and Malocclusion Studies
Background:
- Vertical asymmetries of the mandibular condyle are a potential indicator of craniofacial development.
- Understanding the relationship between occlusion and condylar asymmetry is crucial for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between vertical mandibular condyle asymmetries and various occlusion types in adolescents.
- To compare condylar asymmetry levels across normal occlusion, Angle Class II, Angle Class III malocclusions, and unilateral posterior crossbite (UPC).
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 120 adolescent patients (mean age 13.64 years) without temporomandibular disorders was analyzed.
- Panoramic radiographs were used to measure the asymmetry index of the mandibular condyle.
- Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Main Results:
- No significant gender or age-related differences were observed in condylar height asymmetry.
- While no significant differences were found between Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusions, patients with UPC showed significantly different condylar height asymmetry.
- UPC patients exhibited a distinct level of condylar asymmetry compared to other occlusion groups.
Conclusions:
- Adolescent patients with unilateral posterior crossbite demonstrate asymmetric condylar heights.
- These findings suggest that UPC may predispose individuals to future skeletal mandibular asymmetries.
- Timely intervention for posterior crossbite is recommended to mitigate the risk of developing skeletal asymmetries.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
07:26Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology
Published on: August 22, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Structural Joints: Cartilaginous Joints
There are two types of cartilaginous joints:
Synchondrosis
A synchondrosis ("joined by cartilage") is a cartilaginous joint where bones are connected by hyaline cartilage. Synchondrosis may be temporary...
Unsymmetric Bending - Angle of Neutral Axis
When a bending moment is applied at an angle θ concerning the vertical axis of a symmetrical member, it can be resolved into components along the member's principal...
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints
Types of Building Separation Joints
Volume-change joints address the effects of expansion and contraction due to temperature and moisture variations. They are strategically placed at discontinuities in a building's mass where cracking is most likely and are spaced about 150 to 200...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...