Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026
Measurement of Tumor T2* Relaxation Times after Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Administration
Published on: May 19, 2023
Myocardial and hepatic iron overload assessment by region-based and pixel-wise T2* mapping analysis: technical
Alberto Roghi1, Erika Poggiali, Patrizia Pedrotti
1From the *CMR Unit, Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital; †Rare Diseases Center, Department of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Ca' Granda Foundation Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS; and ‡Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Ca' Granda Foundation Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to compare myocardial T2* assessment with region-based (RB) T2* multiecho technique (CMRtools) with the pixel-wise (PW) inline myocardial T2* mapping (Siemens) in patients with thalassemia major for myocardial iron characterization.
Materials And Methods:
Forty-three thalassemia major patients were examined on a 1.5-T scanner using conventional gradient multiecho sequence. All the images were analyzed using both RB and PW T2* mapping. Coefficients of reproducibility (CRs) were used to assess the interoperator and intraobserver variability of each software.
Results:
The mean (SD) myocardial T2* values using RB and PW software resulted significantly different (30.7 [15] milliseconds [range, 4.8-52.6 milliseconds] vs 24.3 [10.5] milliseconds [range 4.6-38.2 milliseconds]; P < 0.0001). Interestingly, we found that SD had exponential relationship with T2* with evidence of increase in SD for T2* values greater than 20 milliseconds. For myocardial T2* values less than 20 milliseconds, intraobserver CR was 1.2 milliseconds for RB and 1.8 milliseconds for PW T2* mapping, and the interoperator CR was 3.4 and 1.6 milliseconds for RB and PW T2* mapping, respectively. Comparing iron overload classification by both software, we found that 7 patients (16%) were differently categorized using the standard T2* thresholds.
Conclusions:
Our data show that RB and PW T2* mapping can be used interchangeably to measure severe myocardial and hepatic iron overload, whereas for borderline T2* values, we observed differences among the 2 methods causing different categorization.
