Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026
The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model
Published on: January 13, 2023
Mandibular incisor re-crowding: is it different in extraction and non-extraction cases?
A Hamid Zafarmand1, Ali Qamari, M Mahdi Zafarmand
1Department of Orthodontics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Evin, Tehran, Iran; Tel: +98-2122421813;
Introduction:
Relapse of anterior crowding after retention phase is a major complication in orthodontic treatment. It is the most unpredictable phenomena. This study is aimed to compare anterior crowding relapse in patients treated with non-extraction and extraction of upper and lower first premolars related to changes of selected variables.
Materials And Methods:
"Irregularity Index" of dental arch of 40 patients (Extraction group = 21, Non-extraction group = 19) were measured on study models before treatment (T1), post-treatment (T2), and at post-retention (T3). The changes within each group were evaluated using the Wilcoxon test and the Mann-Whitney test was used for inter-group evaluation.
Results:
The mean initial irregularity index was 7.23 mm in extraction group and 6.13 mm in non-extraction group which decreased to 0 mm with treatment. Finally, crowding relapsed to 2.11 mm in extraction group and 1.65 mm in non-extraction group at the post-retention period. These changes were equally statistically significant within both groups. (P-value = 0.001) However, no preference exists between studies groups concerning fewer incisors relapse. (P-value = 0.138) CONCLUSION: Extraction and non-extraction protocols are two different methods of treatment but they show similar tendency to incisor relapse.
