Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

2.9K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.9K
Barriers to Effective Communication II01:21

Barriers to Effective Communication II

5.0K
The barriers to effective communication also include cultural barriers, semantic barriers, gender barriers, and time constraints.
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
5.0K
Barriers to Effective Communication I01:30

Barriers to Effective Communication I

12.5K
A communication barrier is any distortion or interruption during a conversation, resulting in miscommunication of the message. A good communicator should know these barriers and continuously check for the listener's understanding by obtaining feedback.
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...
12.5K
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing01:23

Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing

12.3K
Focusing involves centering a conversation on a message's critical elements or concepts. Focusing is valuable if the talk is vague or patients begin to repeat themselves. Sometimes, when patients are asked about their symptoms, they may go off-topic and try to tell their entire life story. Respectfully, the nurse should bring the conversation back into focus.
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
12.3K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.9K
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
1.9K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation01:25

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation

2.5K
Several factors are considered while creating a patient's care plan. Motivation is a factor in improving communication, and patients often require encouragement to try different approaches involving significant change. It is essential to involve the patient and family in decisions about the plan of care to determine whether the suggested methods are acceptable. Consider meeting critical comfort and safety needs before introducing new communication methods and techniques. Allow adequate time...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Card Sorting to Improve Public Health Information: Enhancing Worker Health Charts.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same author

Do type, timing and duration of life course non-employment differentially predict dementia risk? An application of sequence analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025
Same author

Ethnic Differences in Context: Does Emotional Conflict Mediate the Effects of Both Team- and Individual-Level Ethnic Diversity on Emotional Strain?

Occupational health science·2024
Same author

Multiple Job Holding, Job Changes, and Associations with Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy-Related Hypertension in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2024
Same author

Identifying occupational health inequities in the absence of suitable data: are there inequities in access to adequate bathrooms in US workplaces?

Occupational and environmental medicine·2023
Same author

What does non-standard employment look like in the United States? An empirical typology of employment quality.

Social indicators research·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

5.8K

Perspectives on Communication and Participation in Research Notification Focus Groups.

Heather M Zoller1, Kaori Fujishiro, Amy Mobley

  • 1a Department of Communication , University of Cincinnati.

Health Communication
|October 10, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Researchers should ethically inform participants about study findings, especially regarding occupational exposures. This study highlights how focus groups can improve science communication, but warns against oversimplification, emphasizing collaborative dialogue for better risk understanding.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

14.4K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

5.8K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

14.4K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Risk Communication
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • Ethical obligations for informing research participants about study findings are emerging.
  • Research notification can empower participants to manage health risks.
  • Understanding the science communication process is crucial for effective participant engagement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate audience reactions to scientific research findings on occupational exposures.
  • To evaluate the utility of focus groups in tailoring risk communication materials.
  • To identify limitations in current scientific risk communication strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of focus group transcripts.
  • Qualitative assessment of audience responses to notification materials.
  • Examination of communication models in risk research.

Main Results:

  • Focus groups are valuable for audience-specific material development.
  • Transmission models may limit the perceived value of focus groups.
  • Overemphasis on translating science into "lay" language can hinder collaborative understanding.

Conclusions:

  • Scientific risk communication often minimizes participant involvement.
  • Strengthening science communication requires bridging differences between scientists and lay audiences.
  • Collaborative approaches are essential for effective risk communication and participant engagement.