Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Outcome criteria: a process for validation at the unit level.

B W Gallant, A M McLane

    The Journal of Nursing Administration
    |January 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Constipation: impact of etiological factors.

    Journal of gerontological nursing·1988
    Same author

    Measurement and validation of diagnostic concepts: a decade of progress.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·1987
    Same author

    Constipation. Consensual and empirical validation.

    The Nursing clinics of North America·1985
    Same author

    Nursing diagnosis in critical care: reflections and future directions.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·1985
    Same author

    Tracheal suctioning: a tool for evaluation and learning needs assessment.

    Nursing research·1979
    Same author

    Core competencies of masters-prepared nurses.

    Nursing research·1978
    Same journal

    The CNO-CFO Dyad: A Strategic Driver of Organizational Performance.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Elements of Effective Professional Governance: An Integrative Review.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    New Nurse Well-Being: Implications for Retention, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Safety.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Virtual Nursing Programs in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review of Patient, Nurse, and System-Level Outcomes.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Occupational Fatigue and Cognitive Performance Among Front-Line Nurse Leaders: The Interplay of Personal and Work Factors.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Enhancing Resilience and Well-Being Among Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Narrative Interventions.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    See all related articles

    Staff nurses can now validate nursing care outcomes using a simple, inexpensive process. This method effectively distinguishes between valid and invalid patient care outcomes.

    Area of Science:

    • Nursing
    • Healthcare Quality Improvement
    • Patient Outcomes

    Background:

    • Establishing reliable outcome criteria is crucial for evaluating nursing care quality.
    • Existing validation methods may be complex or costly for unit-level application.
    • A need exists for accessible tools to assess the validity of nursing care outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and validate a practical process for assessing outcome criteria in nursing.
    • To create a method that is simple, inexpensive, and usable by staff nurses at the unit level.
    • To determine if the developed process can differentiate between valid and invalid nursing care outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a novel process for the validation of outcome criteria sets.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Implementation and testing of the process by investigators.
  • Application of the process at the unit level by nursing staff.

    • Main Results:

    • The developed process was successfully implemented and tested.
    • The process proved to be simple and inexpensive for unit-level use.
    • The process effectively differentiated between valid and invalid nursing care outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • A practical and cost-effective process for validating nursing outcome criteria has been developed.
    • Staff nurses can utilize this process to enhance the quality of care evaluation.
    • The findings support the use of this method for improving nursing practice and patient outcomes.