Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

962
962
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

8.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
8.6K
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

1.5K
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
1.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K
Gyroscope: Precession01:24

Gyroscope: Precession

4.7K
Precession can be demonstrated effectively through a spinning top. If a spinning top is placed on a flat surface near the surface of the Earth at a vertical angle and is not spinning, it will fall over due to the force of gravity producing a torque acting on its center of mass. However, if the top is spinning on its axis, it precesses about the vertical direction, rather than topple over due to this torque. Precessional motion is a combination of a steady circular motion of the axis and the...
4.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Universal mechanisms of sound production and control in birds and mammals.

Nature communications·2015
Same author

Unmasking unmasked: neural dynamics following stroke.

Progress in brain research·1999
Same author

Receptive field changes after strokelike cortical ablation: a role for activation dynamics.

Journal of neurophysiology·1998
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 22, 2026

A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds
10:13

A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds

Published on: November 26, 2012

18.0K

Variations on a theme: Songbirds, variability, and sensorimotor error correction.

B D Kuebrich1, S J Sober2

  • 1Neuroscience Doctoral Program and Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Neuroscience
|October 12, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Songbirds learn to correct vocal errors by adjusting to auditory feedback. However, large errors lead to reduced correction, suggesting the brain prioritizes familiar feedback patterns for maintaining accurate learned behaviors.

Keywords:
animal modelssensorimotor learningsensory feedbacksongbirdvariabilityvocal control

More Related Videos

Operant Conditioning Task to Measure Song Preference in Zebra Finches
06:40

Operant Conditioning Task to Measure Song Preference in Zebra Finches

Published on: December 26, 2019

5.5K
Non-aversive Animal Restraint Enabling Recording of Optomotor Reflex in Ground Squirrels
07:28

Non-aversive Animal Restraint Enabling Recording of Optomotor Reflex in Ground Squirrels

Published on: July 25, 2025

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 22, 2026

A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds
10:13

A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds

Published on: November 26, 2012

18.0K
Operant Conditioning Task to Measure Song Preference in Zebra Finches
06:40

Operant Conditioning Task to Measure Song Preference in Zebra Finches

Published on: December 26, 2019

5.5K
Non-aversive Animal Restraint Enabling Recording of Optomotor Reflex in Ground Squirrels
07:28

Non-aversive Animal Restraint Enabling Recording of Optomotor Reflex in Ground Squirrels

Published on: July 25, 2025

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Animal Behavior
  • Auditory Feedback Systems

Background:

  • Songbirds serve as a key model for understanding brain mechanisms of error correction.
  • Investigating how sensory feedback influences motor control is crucial for understanding learning and adaptation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the relationship between auditory error size, motor variability, and vocal plasticity in songbirds.
  • To explore the neural strategies the brain employs to maintain accurate learned behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • Online manipulation of auditory feedback in songbirds.
  • Quantifying behavioral changes in response to varying auditory error sizes.
  • Analyzing vocal plasticity and motor variability.

Main Results:

  • Small auditory errors elicited significant compensatory vocal adjustments.
  • Increasing error size led to a decline in the magnitude of error correction.
  • Very large errors, outside the baseline feedback distribution, resulted in near-zero error correction.

Conclusions:

  • The brain appears to evaluate sensory signals against a distribution of previously experienced feedback to maintain behavioral accuracy.
  • This suggests a robust strategy for stabilizing learned vocalizations.
  • Songbirds offer valuable insights into the neural control of complex behaviors and sensory-motor integration.