Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals

Classification of Signals

In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

High Rank, Low Tolerance: Hierarchy-Dependent Reactions of Cohabiting Companion Dogs to Being Separated from Their Owner.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026

Same author

Attention and improvement: social learning reveals two behavioural dimensions behind dog-human interactions.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026

Same author

Dogs tuned to conspecific vocalizations: behavioral evidence for a voice processing preference.

Animal cognition·2026

Same author

Analysis of human-oriented facial signals of the domestic dog using eye tracker technology.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2026

Same author

Hard-working or hardly working dogs stay young longer? Lifetime sports engagement, joint activity with the owner and breed type are associated with the severity of canine cognitive decline.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2026

Same author

Dogs' reactions to motivations and emotions in conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations.

Scientific reports·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Targeted Training of Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Aged and Parkinsonian Rats

Targeted Training of Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Aged and Parkinsonian Rats

Published on: August 8, 2011

Comparing supervised learning methods for classifying sex, age, context and individual Mudi dogs from barking.

Ana Larrañaga¹, Concha Bielza, Péter Pongrácz

¹Student at the Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio, Av. Universidad, 1, 28691, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain.

Animal Cognition

|October 14, 2014

Summary

Dog barks contain significant information about sex, age, context, and individual identity. Advanced acoustic analysis using machine learning accurately predicts these features, revealing barks as a key communication channel.

More Related Videos

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Published on: June 5, 2016

Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization USV Songs

Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization USV Songs

Published on: May 9, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Targeted Training of Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Aged and Parkinsonian Rats

Targeted Training of Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Aged and Parkinsonian Rats

Published on: August 8, 2011

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Published on: June 5, 2016

Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization USV Songs

Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization USV Songs

Published on: May 9, 2017

Area of Science:

Ethology
Bioacoustics
Machine Learning

Background:

Dog barking is a primary vocalization, yet its role in intraspecific communication is poorly understood.
Computerized acoustic analysis offers a novel approach to deciphering the informational content of dog barks.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the potential of computerized acoustic analysis to classify Mudi dogs based on their barks.
To compare the effectiveness of four supervised learning methods and three feature selection strategies for bark classification.

Main Methods:

Employed naive Bayes, classification trees, k-nearest neighbors, and logistic regression.
Utilized filter and wrapper feature subset selection strategies.
Applied k-fold cross-validation to estimate classification accuracy for sex, age, context, and individual recognition.

Main Results:

Achieved high accuracy in predicting sex (85.13%) and age (80.25%).
Showed promising results for individual recognition (67.63%) and context classification (55.50%).
The k-nearest neighbors method with wrapper feature selection performed best, outperforming previous literature for context and individual classification.

Conclusions:

Dog barks convey substantial indexical information about the caller, including sex and age, which can be predicted via sound analysis.
Machine learning analysis of barks provides evidence that vocalizations are a vital information source in dog-to-dog communication.