Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

585
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
585
Functionalism01:11

Functionalism

2.5K
William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce were instrumental in founding functional psychology, which draws heavily from Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. This theory suggests that individual traits, including behaviors, are adapted to their environments through natural selection. At the heart of functionalism is the concept of adaptation, meaning that a trait enhances an individual's chances of survival and reproduction.
James envisioned psychology's...
2.5K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

58.8K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
58.8K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

359
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
359
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

2.1K
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine understanding.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Judgments of Responsibility for Inequality: A Framework and Review.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

How beliefs persist amid controversy: The paths to persistence model.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

How laypeople evaluate scientific explanations containing jargon.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Evidence for multiple kinds of belief in theory of mind.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Is Ockham's razor losing its edge? New perspectives on the principle of model parsimony.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Explanation and inference: mechanistic and functional explanations guide property generalization.

Tania Lombrozo1, Nicholas Z Gwynne1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|October 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Functional explanations promote generalization based on shared functions, while mechanistic explanations weakly link to generalization via shared parts. Explanation type guides learning and inference.

Keywords:
category-based inductioncausal reasoningexplanationfunctional explanationinductioninferenceproperty generalizationteleological explanation

More Related Videos

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Generalization is crucial for learning and inference.
  • Understanding how explanations influence generalization is key to cognitive processes.
  • Distinguishing between mechanistic and functional explanations is an active research area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between explanation type (mechanistic vs. functional) and generalization patterns.
  • To determine if functional explanations lead to generalization based on function, and mechanistic explanations on parts.
  • To examine the influence of explanation type across different experimental conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted contrasting mechanistic and functional explanations.
  • Participants were presented with information and asked to generalize properties to novel entities.
  • Explanation types were manipulated by being freely generated, experimentally provided, or experimentally induced.

Main Results:

  • Functional explanations significantly increased generalization based on shared functions.
  • Mechanistic explanations showed a weaker association with generalization based on shared parts and processes.
  • The type of explanation influenced generalization regardless of how it was presented or induced.

Conclusions:

  • Explanation type acts as a critical guide for generalization.
  • Findings support the distinction between mechanistic and functional explanations in cognitive research.
  • This research contributes to understanding how humans learn and make inferences from explanations.