Related Experiment Videos
Mixed lymphocyte cultures using automated blood cell counters.
L Poulter1, J A Adams, I Knight
1Department of Haematology, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London, UK.
Bone Marrow Transplantation
|November 1, 1989
Summary
A new cell counting technique effectively distinguishes lymphocyte transformation in histocompatibility testing for bone marrow transplantation donors. This method, using automated counters, offers a viable approach for screening numerous unrelated donors.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Hematology
- Transplantation Science
Background:
- Histocompatibility testing is crucial for successful bone marrow transplantation.
- Standard mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) is a common but time-consuming method.
- Objective assessment of lymphocyte transformation is needed for efficient donor screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a novel cell count and size distribution technique with the standard MLC for histocompatibility testing.
- To evaluate the suitability of the new method for screening large numbers of potential bone marrow donors.
Main Methods:
- A series of histocompatibility tests were performed on 24 patients and 39 potential bone marrow donors.
- Lymphocyte suspensions were analyzed after a 10-day incubation period using a Coulter S+ IV automated counter.
- Cell count and size distribution were measured to assess lymphocyte transformation.
Main Results:
- Lymphocyte transformation was identifiable by increased leucocyte count and wider size distribution.
- A close correlation (r = 0.7; p < 0.001) was observed between response indices from the new method and tritiated thymidine uptake.
- Individual cases showed significant differences in response between the two assessed techniques.
Conclusions:
- The new technique based on cell count and size distribution is a reliable method for assessing lymphocyte transformation.
- This automated method is suitable for efficiently screening large numbers of unrelated donors for bone marrow transplantation.
- The findings suggest a potential improvement in the speed and scalability of donor selection processes.