Why it is sometimes difficult to determine the accurate position of a hydrogen atom by the semiexperimental method:
Natalja Vogt1, Jean Demaison, Jürgen Vogt
1Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Chemical Information Systems, University of Ulm, D-89069, Ulm, Germany; Department of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Abstract:
The semiexperimental (SE) technique, whereby equilibrium rotational constants are derived from experimental ground-state rotational constants and corrections based on an ab initio cubic force field, has the reputation to be one of the most accurate methods to determine an equilibrium structure ( reSE). However, in some cases, it cannot determine accurately the position of the hydrogen. To investigate the origins of this difficulty, the SE structures of several molecules containing either the OH or the CH3 group are determined and compared to their best ab initio counterparts. It appears that an important factor is the accuracy of the geometry used to calculate the force field, in particular when the least-squares system is not well conditioned. In this case, the mixed regression method is often an easy way to circumvent this difficulty.
Related Concept Videos
Inductive Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Proton (¹H) NMR: Chemical Shift
Absorption signals of all the protium nuclei...
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I
¹H NMR Chemical Shift Equivalence: Homotopic and Heterotopic Protons
¹H NMR of Labile Protons: Temporal Resolution
The –OH proton in alcohols typically appears in the range of δ 2 to 5 ppm but can vary depending on the...
¹H NMR Chemical Shift Equivalence: Enantiotopic and Diastereotopic Protons
In chiral compounds such as 2-butanol, replacing the methylene hydrogens at C3 produces a pair of...


