Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Measuring Magnetically-Tuned Ferroelectric Polarization in Liquid Crystals
Published on: August 15, 2018
Modeling the field control of the surface electroclinic effect near continuous and first-order smectic-A* to
Kara Zappitelli1, Dana N Hipolite1, Karl Saunders1
1Department of Physics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California 93407, USA.
Abstract:
We present and analyze a model for the combination of bulk and surface electroclinic effects in the smectic-A* (Sm-A*) phase near a Sm-A*-Sm-C* transition. As part of our analysis we calculate the dependence of the surface tilt on external electric field and show that it can be eliminated, or even reversed from its zero-field value, as demonstrated in previous experimental work on a system (W415) with a continuous Sm-A*-Sm-C* transition. We also analyze, for the first time, the combination of bulk and surface electroclinic effects in systems with a first-order Sm-A*-Sm-C* transition. The variation of surface tilt with electric field in this case is much more dramatic, with discontinuities and hysteresis. With regard to technological, e.g., display, applications, this could be a feature to be avoided or potentially exploited. Near each type of Sm-A*-Sm-C* transition we obtain the temperature dependence of the field required to eliminate surface tilt. Additionally, we analyze the effect of varying the system's enantiomeric excess, showing that it strongly affects the field dependence of surface tilt, in particular, near a first-order Sm-A*-Sm-C* transition. In this case, increasing enantiomeric excess can change the field dependence of surface tilt from continuous to discontinuous. Our model also allows us to calculate the variation of layer spacing in going from surface to bulk, which in turn allows us to estimate the strain resulting from the difference between the surface and bulk layer spacing. We show that for certain ranges of applied electric field, this strain can result in layer buckling, which reduces the overall quality of the liquid crystal cell. For de Vries materials, with small tilt-induced change in layer spacing, the induced strain for a given surface tilt should be smaller. However, we argue that this may be offset by the fact that de Vries materials, which typically have Sm-A*-Sm-C* transitions near a tricritical point, will generally have larger surface tilt.
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions in Dielectrics
Consider a case where both the mediums across a boundary are two different dielectric materials. Recall that the electric field and electric displacement are proportional and related through the material's permittivity....
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions
The surface integral of an electric field is given by Gauss's law in integral form and is related to...
Electric Field at the Surface of a Conductor
In the 19th century, Michael Faraday conducted the famous ice pail experiment to prove that the charges always reside on the surface of a conductor. The experimental set-up consists of a conducting uncharged container mounted on an insulating stand. The outer surface of the container is...
The Electrical Double Layer
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than...

