Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

4.3K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
4.3K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.7K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.6K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.6K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

2.6K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visualization of liquid-liquid phase transitions using a tiny G-quadruplex binding protein.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Risk-based approach to setting sterile filtration microbial bioburden limits - Focus on biotech-derived products.

European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V·2023
Same author

Modeling immunogenecity data to establish screening bioassays cut point.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2023
Same author

Stability analysis using mixed models: A critique of tolerance interval methods and a probabilistic solution.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2023
Same author

RNA-seq data science: From raw data to effective interpretation.

Frontiers in genetics·2023
Same author

A comparison of statistical methods for animal oncology studies.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2022
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Detection of Regulated Ergot Alkaloids in Food Matrices by Liquid Chromatography-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
08:56

Detection of Regulated Ergot Alkaloids in Food Matrices by Liquid Chromatography-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: November 22, 2024

1.6K

Testing assay linearity over a pre-specified range.

Harry Yang1, Steven J Novick, David LeBlond

  • 1a MedImmune, LLC , Gaithersburg , Maryland , USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|October 31, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new statistical method simplifies linearity testing, a key regulatory requirement in analytical chemistry. This approach addresses common challenges, making it easier for users to validate assay linearity accurately and efficiently.

Keywords:
Equivalence testFieller’s exact confidence intervalGeneralized pivotal quantityLinearity testingOrthogonal regression

More Related Videos

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

16.6K
Linearization of the Bradford Protein Assay
06:35

Linearization of the Bradford Protein Assay

Published on: April 12, 2010

95.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Detection of Regulated Ergot Alkaloids in Food Matrices by Liquid Chromatography-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
08:56

Detection of Regulated Ergot Alkaloids in Food Matrices by Liquid Chromatography-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: November 22, 2024

1.6K
Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

16.6K
Linearization of the Bradford Protein Assay
06:35

Linearization of the Bradford Protein Assay

Published on: April 12, 2010

95.6K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Linearity validation is a critical regulatory requirement in analytical method development.
  • Existing linearity testing methods present challenges in setting acceptable limits and are difficult for non-statisticians to implement.
  • Current approaches often depend on the specific concentration levels used during the linearity experiment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel statistical procedure for robust linearity testing.
  • To overcome the limitations of existing methods, particularly regarding implementation and limit setting.
  • To provide an easy-to-implement solution for validating assay linearity.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed method employs a two one-sided test (TOST) of equivalence.
  • It evaluates the potential bias introduced by approximating higher-order polynomial responses with a linear model.
  • Utilizes orthogonal polynomials and generalized pivotal quantity analysis for a closed-form solution.

Main Results:

  • The method provides a statistically sound procedure for linearity validation.
  • Offers a closed-form solution, simplifying the implementation process.
  • Addresses the difficulties in setting fit-for-purpose acceptable limits.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed statistical procedure offers a practical and accessible solution for linearity testing.
  • Enhances the reliability and ease of regulatory compliance for analytical methods.
  • Facilitates accurate linearity assessment for a wider range of users.