Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

11:54
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
Published on: May 8, 2021
4.2K
Modeling of performance and ANS activity for predicting future responses to training
Sébastien Chalencon1, Vincent Pichot, Frédéric Roche
1Laboratory SNA-EPIS EA4607, Jean Monnet University of Saint Etienne, COMUE Lyon, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France, seb.chalencon@gmail.com.
European Journal of Applied Physiology
|November 1, 2014
Summary
Training load modeling accurately predicts swimming performance and heart rate variability (HF power) week-to-week. This supports its use for controlling and predicting athlete responses to training.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Exercise Physiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Monitoring training load and physiological responses is crucial for optimizing athletic performance.
- Heart rate variability (HF power) offers insights into autonomic nervous system regulation during training.
- Predictive modeling can aid in tailoring training regimens to individual athletes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive accuracy of training responses using established models.
- To assess the predictability of swimming performance and high-frequency power (HF power) from previous training data.
- To compare the variable dose-response model against the Banister model for prediction.
Main Methods:
- Ten swimmers were monitored over 30 weeks, with weekly measurements of performance and HF power.
- Models were parameterized using the first 15 weeks of training data.
- Predictions for performance and HF power were made for the subsequent 15 weeks.
- Prediction accuracy was assessed using bias and precision metrics.
Main Results:
- The variable dose-response model demonstrated good predictive accuracy for swimming performance (bias -0.24 ± 0.06%, precision 0.69 ± 0.24%).
- Predictions for HF power showed higher variability (bias 0 ± 21%, precision 22 ± 8%).
- Transforming HF power to performance improved prediction accuracy (bias 0.18 ± 0.74%, precision 0.80 ± 0.30%).
Conclusions:
- Training effect modeling provides accurate predictions of swimming performance.
- This approach is relevant for week-to-week control and prediction of training responses.
- Further refinement may be needed for precise HF power prediction.
Related Concept Videos
Autonomic Nervous System: Overview
6.3K
The human nervous system is divided into two main parts: the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral nervous system (PNS). The CNS is composed of the brain and spinal cord, while the PNS contains nerve cells, clusters of nerve cells, and the sensory receptors that are outside the CNS. The PNS has two types of nerve cells: sensory (afferent) and motor (efferent). Sensory cells send signals to the CNS from receptors, and motor cells carry signals from the CNS to organs, muscles, and...
6.3K
Autonomic Nervous System
31.3K
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a critical component of the peripheral nervous system, primarily responsible for regulating involuntary bodily functions and maintaining homeostasis. It functions in tandem with the central nervous system (CNS) to seamlessly coordinate various physiological processes without the need for conscious control.
The ANS comprises two main divisions: the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions. These divisions function antagonistically to maintain a dynamic...
The ANS comprises two main divisions: the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions. These divisions function antagonistically to maintain a dynamic...
31.3K

