Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

1.2K
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Regulatory crosstalk between KLF5, miR-29a and Fbw7/CDC4 cooperatively promotes atherosclerotic development.

Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease·2017
Same author

Near-Infrared Light Triggered Upconversion Optogenetic Nanosystem for Cancer Therapy.

ACS nano·2017
Same author

Non-contact method to freely control the radiation patterns of antenna with multi-folded transformation optics.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

Cost Effectiveness of Imatinib, Dasatinib, and Nilotinib as First-Line Treatment for Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in China.

Clinical drug investigation·2017
Same author

Improving Performance of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction by Incorporating Optical Density Image Feature Analysis: An Assessment.

Academic radiology·2017
Same author

Preliminary study on ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy specimen scores.

Experimental and therapeutic medicine·2017
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

2.1K

Surgical team composition differs between laparoscopic and open procedures.

Bin Zheng1, Eric Fung, Bo Fu

  • 1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, bin.zheng@ualberta.ca.

Surgical Endoscopy
|November 2, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Laparoscopic surgery requires larger teams and longer operation times than open surgery, even when accounting for case difficulty. These differences may stem from the unique complexities and team dynamics inherent to laparoscopic procedures.

More Related Videos

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
12:34

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction

Published on: January 3, 2020

17.5K
Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:41

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: March 10, 2023

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

2.1K
Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
12:34

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction

Published on: January 3, 2020

17.5K
Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:41

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: March 10, 2023

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Techniques
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Laparoscopic procedures necessitate distinct surgical skills and team interactions compared to open procedures.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for optimizing surgical workflows and patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare surgical team composition and procedure duration between laparoscopic and open general surgical procedures.
  • To identify factors influencing team size and time beyond mere case complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 1,260 general surgical cases from US and Canadian hospitals.
  • Data collection included operation personnel count, procedure complexity coding, and procedure time.
  • Analysis involved comparing metrics between laparoscopic and open approaches, including matched-difficulty cases.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic procedures (n=930) generally exhibited higher difficulty coding, longer procedure times, and larger surgical teams than open procedures (n=330).
  • Even when controlling for procedure difficulty, laparoscopic cases (n=450) still required more time and personnel than comparable open cases (n=92).

Conclusions:

  • Factors beyond case difficulty, such as the inherent complexity of the laparoscopic surgical setting and unique team dynamics, contribute to increased team size and procedure time.
  • Optimizing laparoscopic surgical efficiency may require addressing these underlying environmental and interpersonal factors.