Note: Split PID control--two sensors can be better than one
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
Published on: November 24, 2021
Leith Znaimer1, John Bechhoefer1
1Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada.
Abstract:
The traditional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algorithm for regulation suffers from a tradeoff: placing the sensor near the sample being regulated ensures that its steady-state temperature matches the desired setpoint. However, the propagation delay (lag) between heater and sample can limit the control bandwidth. Moving the sensor closer to the heater reduces the lag and increases the bandwidth but introduces offsets and drifts into the temperature of the sample. Here, we explore the consequences of using two probes-one near the heater, one near the sample-and assigning the integral term to the sample probe and the other terms to the heater probe. The split-PID algorithm can outperform PID control loops based on one sensor.
Related Concept Videos
PID Controller
PI Controller: Design
Bioreactor Controls-I
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires...
Bioreactor Controls-II
Open and closed-loop control systems
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...

