Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

A Full Skin Defect Model to Evaluate Vascularization of Biomaterials In Vivo
Published on: August 28, 2014
Bioresorbable scaffolds: focus on vascular response and long-term safety
G Scalone1, S Brugaletta, O Gomez
1Thorax Institute. Department of Cardiology IDIBAPS: Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques Agust Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain - masabate@clinic.ub.es.
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) offer a promising alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES) by enabling vascular restoration. While feasible across diverse patients and lesions, ongoing trials are crucial to confirm their long-term safety and efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomaterials Science
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) represent a significant advancement over traditional drug-eluting stents (DES).
- BVS aim to address limitations of DES by promoting natural vascular healing through 'vascular restoration therapy'.
- Initial real-world data indicate feasibility of BVS implantation in a broad spectrum of patient risk profiles and lesion complexities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the potential advantages of Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in Interventional Cardiology.
- To assess the feasibility and safety of BVS in diverse clinical scenarios.
- To compare the long-term outcomes of BVS against current best-in-class drug-eluting stents (DES).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of emerging data from real-world expanded use registries of BVS.
- Evaluation of patient populations ranging from low- to high-risk.
- Assessment of lesion complexity from simple to complex interventions.
Main Results:
- BVS implantation is feasible in a wide variety of patients and lesions.
- Initial experiences have highlighted some safety concerns associated with currently available BVS.
- Large-scale randomized controlled trials are underway to provide definitive data.
Conclusions:
- BVS hold promise as the next generation of coronary implants, potentially offering superior vascular healing.
- Further evidence from large randomized trials is necessary to establish the definitive safety and efficacy profile of BVS compared to DES.
- The long-term clinical impact of BVS hinges on addressing identified safety concerns and demonstrating improved patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
11:12Nondestructive Monitoring of Degradable Scaffold-Based Tissue-Engineered Blood Vessel Development Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: October 3, 2018
09:34Visualizing Angiogenesis by Multiphoton Microscopy In Vivo in Genetically Modified 3D-PLGA/nHAp Scaffold for Calvarial Critical Bone Defect Repair
Published on: September 7, 2017