Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
Hyperresponders vs. nonresponder patients after renal denervation: do they differ?
Alexandre Persu1, Michel Azizi, Yu Jin
1aPole of Cardiovascular Research, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain bDivision of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium cAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France dStudies Coordinating Center, Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Leuven, Belgium eDepartment of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden fThird Department of Internal Medicine, General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic gDepartment of Cardiology, Ullevaal University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway hDepartment of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva iDepartment of Nephrology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland jBHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom kDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands lKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden mDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Renal denervation (RDN) response varies greatly. Office blood pressure (BP) measurements may overestimate RDN effectiveness, unlike ambulatory BP, which better identifies true responders and nonresponders.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Hypertension Management
Background:
- Blood pressure (BP) response to renal denervation (RDN) is highly variable.
- Predictors of BP response to RDN remain inconsistently identified.
- Differences between major BP decrease responders and nonresponders after RDN require investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify extreme BP responders and nonresponders to RDN.
- To compare baseline characteristics and 6-month BP changes in these subsets.
- To evaluate the impact of measurement method (office vs. ambulatory BP) on response definition.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the European Network COordinating research on Renal Denervation database (n=109).
- Defined extreme responders (first quintile) and nonresponders (fifth quintile) based on office or 24-h ambulatory BP.
- Compared baseline characteristics and BP changes at 6 months post-RDN.
Main Results:
- Ambulatory BP-defined responders showed similar office and out-of-office BP changes.
- Office BP-defined responders exhibited a significant white-coat effect reduction.
- Office BP-defined responders had higher baseline office BP, were more often women, and had higher eGFR compared to nonresponders.
Conclusions:
- Office BP measurements may overestimate RDN response compared to ambulatory BP.
- Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is associated with poorer RDN response.
- Higher proportion of women among extreme responders might indicate sex differences in adherence.
More Related Videos
04:37Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
11:08Novel Approach for Simultaneous Recording of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Blood Pressure with Intravenous Infusion in Conscious, Unrestrained Mice.
Published on: February 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers