Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Extraction: Partition and Distribution Coefficients01:14

Extraction: Partition and Distribution Coefficients

5.7K
The distribution law or Nernst's distribution law is the law that governs the distribution of a solute between two immiscible solvents. This law, also known as the partition law, states that if a solute is added to the mixture of two immiscible solvents at a constant temperature, the solute is distributed between the two solvents in such a way that the ratio of solute concentrations in the solvents remains constant at equilibrium.
For extracting a solute from an aqueous phase into an...
5.7K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

6.5K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
6.5K
Coefficient of Variation01:10

Coefficient of Variation

9.1K
The coefficient of variation measures the dispersion of the data points or distribution around the mean. Using the coefficient of variation, we can compare two data series with drastically different means or different units of measurement. The coefficient of variation for a sample and a population is expressed as a percentage of the ratio of standard deviation to the mean.
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
9.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lipid packing contributes to the confinement of caveolae to the plasma membrane.

eLife·2026
Same author

Protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection is achieved when simvastatin is supplied before infection and causes membrane reorganisation.

Infectious diseases (London, England)·2026
Same author

The Safety and Effectiveness of Early Anti-Tumor-Necrosis-Factor Therapy for Penetrating Crohn's Disease Complications in Children.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

High Rates of Seroprotection for Measles in Pediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Antibiotic Utilization for Perianal Fistulizing Complications among Young Patients with Crohn's Disease.

The Journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in pediatric Crohn's disease: Results of the REALITI study.

Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Visualisation and Quantification of Intracellular Interactions of Neisseria meningitidis and Human α-actinin by Confocal Imaging
12:58

Visualisation and Quantification of Intracellular Interactions of Neisseria meningitidis and Human α-actinin by Confocal Imaging

Published on: October 24, 2010

18.7K

Quantifying colocalization: thresholding, void voxels and the H(coef).

Jeremy Adler1, Ingela Parmryd2

  • 1Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Plos One
|November 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate image analysis requires robust nucleus identification. New local background thresholding methods outperform local mean, while the H(coef) for colocalization requires careful interpretation due to mixing correlation and co-occurrence.

More Related Videos

Tracking Drug-induced Changes in Receptor Post-internalization Trafficking by Colocalizational Analysis
07:48

Tracking Drug-induced Changes in Receptor Post-internalization Trafficking by Colocalizational Analysis

Published on: July 3, 2015

9.3K
Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence
07:55

Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence

Published on: June 26, 2020

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Visualisation and Quantification of Intracellular Interactions of Neisseria meningitidis and Human α-actinin by Confocal Imaging
12:58

Visualisation and Quantification of Intracellular Interactions of Neisseria meningitidis and Human α-actinin by Confocal Imaging

Published on: October 24, 2010

18.7K
Tracking Drug-induced Changes in Receptor Post-internalization Trafficking by Colocalizational Analysis
07:48

Tracking Drug-induced Changes in Receptor Post-internalization Trafficking by Colocalizational Analysis

Published on: July 3, 2015

9.3K
Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence
07:55

Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence

Published on: June 26, 2020

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Image analysis
  • Biomedical imaging
  • Computational biology

Background:

  • Identifying regions of interest, such as cell nuclei, is crucial for image analysis.
  • Intensity thresholding for nuclei segmentation is challenged by variations in nuclear intensity and background contrast.
  • Local thresholding methods offer a solution to variations in global image intensity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate local thresholding methods for nucleus segmentation.
  • To assess the utility and interpretation of a new colocalization coefficient, H(coef).
  • To clarify the measurement and interpretation of molecular interactions and correlations in biological images.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of local thresholding techniques including local mean, Phansalkar method, and a novel local background identification method.
  • Development and evaluation of the H(coef) for measuring colocalization.
  • Analysis of negative correlations in colocalization data, distinguishing between biological separation and intensity anti-correlation.

Main Results:

  • The local mean method performed poorly for nucleus segmentation.
  • The Phansalkar method and the new local background method demonstrated superior performance in nucleus identification.
  • The H(coef) conflates correlation and co-occurrence, making interpretation problematic, especially in heterogeneous biological samples.

Conclusions:

  • Novel local background thresholding methods provide superior nucleus segmentation compared to local mean.
  • The H(coef) is not recommended for measuring molecular interactions due to its conflation of correlation and co-occurrence.
  • Separate measurements of correlation and co-occurrence are advised for accurate interpretation of molecular interactions in biological images.