Discordancy in BRAF mutations among primary and metastatic melanoma lesions: clinical implications for targeted

Joshua R Bradish1, Justin D Richey1, Kristin M Post1

  • 1Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Insights

Melanoma BRAF mutation status can differ between primary tumors and metastases. This discordancy, found in 16% of patients, impacts targeted therapy selection and treatment response for BRAF inhibitor therapies.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Dermatology

Background:

  • Targeted molecular therapy using BRAF inhibitors is standard for BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma.
  • The BRAF mutation status of metastatic lesions relative to the primary tumor is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the frequency and implications of BRAF mutation status discordancy between primary and metastatic melanoma.

Main Methods:

  • BRAF V600E/Ec, V600K, V600D, and V600R mutations were analyzed in primary and matched metastatic lesions from 25 melanoma patients.
  • A BRAF RGQ PCR kit (Qiagen) was utilized for mutation detection.

Main Results:

  • Discordant BRAF mutation status was observed in 4 out of 25 patients (16%).
  • Two patients (8%) showed BRAF-positive primary tumors with BRAF-negative metastases.
  • Two patients (8%) had BRAF-negative primary tumors with BRAF-positive metastases.

Conclusions:

  • BRAF mutation status discordancy between primary and metastatic melanoma is a significant finding.
  • Testing metastatic lesions for BRAF status in previously negative patients is crucial for appropriate BRAF inhibitor therapy allocation.
  • Discordant BRAF status may influence patient response and resistance patterns to BRAF inhibitor treatments.

Related Concept Videos