Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Intraoperative laxity measurements using a navigation system in anatomical double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament
Yuka Kimura1, Eiichi Tsuda2, Yasuharu Hiraga2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Zaifu-cho 5, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan. yukax10@cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
Purpose:
The objective of this study was to evaluate knee kinematics during double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-PCLR) intraoperatively using a navigation system, and especially assess biomechanical behaviour of the anterolateral bundle (ALB) and posteromedial bundle (PMB) graft in DB-PCLR. Also, clinical results of minimum 2-year follow-up were investigated.
Methods:
Nine patients received DB-PCLR with hamstring graft. Before reconstruction, knee laxities, including posterior tibial translation (PTT) in neutral rotation at 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion, were measured using a kinematic-based navigation system. After the PMB or ALB was temporally fixed, the knee laxities were measured in the same manner. Each patient was evaluated pre- and post-operatively with side-to-side difference of tibial position in gravity sag view and Lysholm score.
Results:
Both ALB and PMB fixation restrained the PTT compared to PCL deficiency throughout all knee flexion angles. At 90° of knee flexion, ALB fixation significantly decreased PTT compare to PMB fixation (p = 0.014) and DB-PCLR significantly decreased PTT compare to ALB fixation (p = 0.045). The mean side-to-side difference of tibial position in gravity sag view was 12.0 ± 1.7 mm preoperatively and 2.3 ± 1.8 mm at final follow-up, and the mean Lysholm scores were 68.9 ± 20.9 and 96.3 ± 2.9, respectively.
Conclusions:
There were no significant differences in the PTT between ALB and PMB fixations at 0° to 75° of knee flexion, and both ALB and PMB reconstructions are important for restraining PTT. At 90° of knee flexion, the ALB grafts may be more important to control PTT compared to PMB grafts; however, neither single-bundle reconstruction with ALB nor PMB could function as DB-PCLR did. In addition, PTT after DB-PCLR was strongly correlated side-to-side difference in posterior sag view at the final follow-up. The results from this study indicated that both ALB and PMB are important to stabilize PCL-deficient knees.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic study, Level III.
