Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimation of Hand Grip Strength Using a Grip Force Transducer in Healthy Volunteers.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Sustainable diets and functional foods for the prevention of cardio-metabolic diseases and sustainable development goals of the UNO. An international consensus of scientific statement of the international college of nutrition and 28th world congress on clinical nutrition, Bogor, Indonesia.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2026
Same author

Born-Jordan frequency distribution based E-GMANN controller for vibration analysis in SSI based asymmetric floor buildings with ATMD.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Co-infection of Dengue and Malaria Complicated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in a Critically Ill Patient: A Case Report From a Tertiary Care Center in Jharkhand, India.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Association of Body Size and Muscle Grip Strength With Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Electromyographic Evaluation of Grip Force and Anthropometrics of the Dominant Hand in Cricketers.

Cureus·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.6K

Influence of visual angle on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.

Ruchi Kothari1, Smita Singh2, Ramji Singh3

  • 1Department of Physiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
|November 8, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found that visual angle significantly impacts pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PRVEP) parameters in healthy adults. A 120-minute arc check size is optimal for reliable PRVEP interpretation and optic nerve assessment.

Keywords:
P100 amplitudeP100 latencyPattern reversalVEPvisual angle

More Related Videos

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

27.0K
Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

13.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.6K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

27.0K
Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

13.1K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are crucial for assessing visual pathway function.
  • Pattern reversal VEPs (PRVEPs) are sensitive to stimulus parameters, including check size.
  • Determining optimal stimulus parameters is essential for reliable diagnostic interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of varying visual angles on pattern reversal VEP (PRVEP) latencies and amplitudes in healthy adults.
  • To identify the optimal visual angle for reliable PRVEP interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Forty healthy volunteers were divided into two groups, tested with different visual angles (15, 30, 90, 120, 180 minutes of arc).
  • Transient pattern reversal checkerboard stimuli were presented on a VEP monitor.
  • One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis.

Main Results:

  • Maximum P100 latency and amplitude varied significantly across different visual angles.
  • The 120-minute arc visual angle yielded the minimum P100 latency in both groups.
  • Statistically significant differences were observed in P100 latency and amplitude means between various check sizes.

Conclusions:

  • Stimulus visual angle significantly influences PRVEP parameters.
  • A 120-minute arc check size is identified as the optimal parameter for accurate PRVEP interpretation.
  • This finding aids in the improved assessment of optic nerve function and anterior visual pathway integrity.