Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography

Published on: April 8, 2019

Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study.

Timothy Leffel¹, Miriam Lauter², Masha Westerlund³

¹Department of Linguistics, New York University , 10 Washington Place, New York , NY 10003 , USA.

Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

|November 8, 2014

Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Unified Neural Time Course for Words, Phrases, and Sentences: MEG Evidence from Parallel Presentation.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same author

Multi-talker speech comprehension at different temporal scales in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

eLife·2026

Same author

MEG investigation of adjective order preferences as a syntactic constraint.

Cognition·2026

Same author

Cortical representation of quantification: The role of the left anterior temporal lobe.

Cognition·2025

Same author

Semantic composition in experimental and naturalistic paradigms.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Same author

Changes in auditory evoked responses at different levels of linguistic processing in adults and school-age children: An MEG study.

Neuropsychologia·2025

Same journal

See what I mean? Reading visual verbs modulates ocular dynamics.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Action and Event-Based Lexical-Semantic Processing in Parkinson's Disease.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Within- and between-language competition in adult second language learners: implications for language proficiency.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2025

Same journal

Timecourse of bottom-up and top-down language processing during a picture-based semantic priming task.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2025

Same journal

LDL-AURIS: a computational model, grounded in error-driven learning, for the comprehension of single spoken words.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2025

Same journal

Altered Oscillatory Neural Dynamics Related to Word Prediction in Older Adult Readers.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2025

See all related articles

This summary is machine-generated.

The left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) processes phrase composition and responds to contextual cues. This brain region shows sensitivity to restrictive language, particularly determiners, highlighting its role in high-level language understanding.

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Psycholinguistics
Cognitive Science

Background:

The left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) is recognized for its role in simple phrase composition.
Previous studies lacked contextual information, leaving LATL's sensitivity to context unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the sensitivity of the LATL to contextual factors in language processing.
To determine if the LATL responds differently to restrictive versus non-restrictive linguistic elements.

Main Methods:

Utilized magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure brain activity.
Employed a question-answer paradigm to manipulate restrictive interpretation of prenominal adjectives and determiners.

Main Results:

Keywords:

MEG composition left anterior temporal lobe pragmatics

More Related Videos

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG

Published on: June 14, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography

Published on: April 8, 2019

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG

Published on: June 14, 2010

The LATL showed heightened responses to restrictive composition compared to non-restrictive composition.

This sensitivity to restriction was significant for determiners but showed an opposite pattern for adjectives.

The observed pattern for adjectives may be influenced by pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives.

Conclusions:

The LATL is sensitive to high-level contextual information during language processing.
The findings suggest the LATL's role extends beyond simple phrase composition to include contextual and pragmatic factors.