Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Tissue Characterization after a New Disaggregation Method for Skin Micro-Grafts Generation
Published on: March 4, 2016
Comparison of Decontamination Methods for Human Skin Grafts
Elizabeth A Mann-Salinas1, Denar D Joyner, Charles H Guymon
1From the US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas.
Abstract:
Skin grafts intended for autologous transplant may be dropped on the operating room floor during handling. The authors examined optimal procedures for decontaminating tissue intended for burn surgery. Porcine skin (5 × 5 cm sections) harvested from expired animals using standard procedures was inoculated with either 10(6) CFU/ml Staphylococcus aureus or Klebsiella pneumoniae. Decontaminating strategies were compared: 10% povidone iodine, 0.04% chlorhexidine, or 50 U/ml bacitracin for injection, and mechanical agitation using normal saline or sterile water; each agent was applied for 60 seconds. Each skin section was blended and plated on agar for bacterial enumeration using the spread plate method. Tissue viability was evaluated in parallel using a cell viability reagent, along with a control (heat at 200 °C for 5 min). Bacterial counts were log transformed; one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer HSD analysis were performed. Concentration of organisms <10(5) CFU/g was considered clinically insignificant colonization. Eight donors provided 21 S. aureus and six K. pneumoniae samples. After exposure, mean organism concentration (CFU/g) was <10(5) for povidone iodine (S. aureus 2.83 × 10(4); K. pneumoniae 1.85 × 10(4)), chlorhexidine (S. aureus 4.52 × 10(4); K. pneumoniae 1.77 × 10(4)), and normal saline (K. pneumoniae 8.76 × 10(4)) treated groups. After log transform, only povidone iodine and chlorhexidine were found to be different from control in both groups. Viability was decreased in the positive control group, but not in treatment groups. Agents routinely used for surgical skin prep (povidone iodine and chlorhexidine), reduced both Gram-positive and Gram-negative contamination in tissue intended for skin grafting procedures. Antiseptic treatments did not impair the cellular viability of porcine skin.
Insights
Povidone iodine and chlorhexidine effectively decontaminate dropped skin grafts for autologous transplant, reducing bacterial load without affecting tissue viability. These antiseptic agents are suitable for burn surgery preparation.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Innovation
- Microbiology
- Tissue Engineering
Background:
- Autologous skin grafts are crucial for burn surgery.
- Accidental contamination of grafts on the operating room floor poses a significant risk.
- Effective decontamination protocols are essential to ensure graft viability and patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of different decontamination agents for bacterial reduction on dropped skin grafts.
- To assess the impact of decontamination agents on the cellular viability of porcine skin tissue.
- To identify optimal procedures for preparing contaminated skin grafts for autologous transplantation.
Main Methods:
- Porcine skin sections were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus or Klebsiella pneumoniae.
- Decontamination strategies included povidone iodine, chlorhexidine, bacitracin, normal saline, and sterile water.
- Bacterial enumeration was performed using the spread plate method, and tissue viability was assessed.
- Statistical analysis involved log transformation and one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer HSD.
Main Results:
- Povidone iodine and chlorhexidine significantly reduced bacterial concentrations below 10(5) CFU/g for both S. aureus and K. pneumoniae.
- Normal saline also reduced K. pneumoniae contamination to clinically insignificant levels.
- No significant decrease in tissue viability was observed in the povidone iodine or chlorhexidine treatment groups.
Conclusions:
- Povidone iodine and chlorhexidine are effective antiseptic agents for decontaminating skin grafts contaminated in the operating room.
- These agents reduce both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial contamination without compromising tissue viability.
- The findings support the use of standard surgical skin prep antiseptics for preparing potentially contaminated grafts for burn surgery.

