Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

06:11
Arterial Pouch Microsurgical Bifurcation Aneurysm Model in the Rabbit
Published on: May 14, 2020
3.0K
Relationship between aneurysm occlusion and flow diverting device oversizing in a rabbit model
Simona Hodis1, Yong-Hong Ding1, Daying Dai1
1Neuroradiology Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery
|November 13, 2014
Summary
Flow diverter device sizing in rabbit aneurysms did not impact pore density or metal coverage. Aneurysm occlusion was inversely related to ostium diameter, not device size.
Area of Science:
- Endovascular therapy
- Cerebrovascular disease
- Medical device engineering
Background:
- Flow diverter pore density is believed to depend on device-artery size matching.
- Understanding this relationship is crucial for effective aneurysm treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between flow diverter device sizing, metal coverage, and aneurysm occlusion.
- To evaluate these factors in a rabbit aneurysm model.
Main Methods:
- Rabbit saccular aneurysms were treated with flow diverters (iso-sized, 0.5mm oversized, 1.0mm oversized).
- Aneurysm occlusion was assessed angiographically after 8 weeks.
- Metal coverage and pore density at the aneurysm ostium were calculated and correlated with occlusion.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in aneurysm occlusion were observed among the different device sizing groups.
- Neither metal coverage nor pore density varied significantly between groups.
- Aneurysm occlusion showed an inverse correlation with the ostium diameter, independent of device size.
Conclusions:
- Flow diverter device sizing alone does not reliably predict pore density or metal coverage in this model.
- Aneurysm occlusion is primarily influenced by the ostium diameter, not by metal coverage or pore density.
- These findings suggest ostium diameter is a key factor in flow diverter treatment outcomes.

