Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with preserved left
Jeong Hoon Yang1, Joo-Yong Hahn2, Young Bin Song3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Angiotensin receptor blockers are as effective as ACE inhibitors for treating ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with preserved heart function. These blockers offer a comparable alternative to ACE inhibitors, improving cardiac outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management focuses on preserving left ventricular systolic function.
- Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, including angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, are crucial in post-MI care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between ARB treatment and clinical outcomes in STEMI patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVEF ≥ 40%).
- To compare the efficacy of ARBs versus ACE inhibitors and no RAS blockade in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study utilizing a nationwide Korean registry (November 2005 - September 2010).
- Included 6698 STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention with LVEF ≥ 40%.
- Compared outcomes (cardiac death or myocardial infarction) among ARB, ACE inhibitor, and no RAS blocker groups, with propensity score matching.
Main Results:
- After propensity score matching, ARB use showed no significant difference in cardiac death or myocardial infarction compared to ACE inhibitor use (1.8% vs. 2.0%, aHR 0.65).
- ARB use was associated with a significantly lower rate of cardiac death or myocardial infarction compared to no RAS blocker use (1.7% vs. 3.1%, aHR 0.35).
Conclusions:
- Angiotensin receptor blockers demonstrate comparable efficacy to ACE inhibitors in STEMI patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function.
- ARBs represent a viable alternative to ACE inhibitors for this specific patient population, offering similar cardioprotective benefits.
Objective:
To investigate the association between treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker and clinical outcomes in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular systolic function.
Design:
A prospective cohort study using data from a nationwide large scale registry.
Setting:
53 hospitals involved in treatment of acute myocardial infarction in Korea.
Participants:
Between November 2005 and September 2010, we studied 6698 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and had a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40%.
Main Outcome Measures:
Cardiac death or myocardial infarction. Patients were divided into an angiotensin receptor blocker group (n=1185), an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor group (n=4564), and a group who did not receive any renin angiotensin system blocker (n=949). Propensity score matching analysis was also performed.
Results:
Cardiac death or myocardial infarction occurred in 21 patients (1.8%) in the angiotensin receptor blocker group, 77 patients (1.7%) in the ACE inhibitor group, and 33 patients (3.5%) in the no renin angiotensin system blocker group. After propensity score matching (1175 pairs), there was no significant difference in the rate of cardiac death or myocardial infarction between the angiotensin receptor blocker group and ACE inhibitor group (21 (1.8%) v 23 (2.0%), adjusted hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 1.38; P=0.65). The angiotensin receptor blocker group had a lower rate of cardiac death or myocardial infarction than the no renin angiotensin system blocker group in matched populations (803 pairs) (14 (1.7%) v 25 (3.1%), 0.35, 0.14 to 0.90; P=0.03).
Conclusion:
Angiotensin receptor blocker showed beneficial effects comparable with ACE inhibitors in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular systolic function. Angiotensin receptor blockers could be used as an alternative to ACE inhibitors in such patients.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

