Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
Published on: August 4, 2023
European Bioanalysis Forum: recommendation for dealing with internal standard variability
Stephen White1, Neil Adcock, Walid Elbast
1Bioanalytical Science & Toxicokinetics, Drug Metabolism & Pharmacokinetics, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Ware, UK.
Monitoring internal standard (IS) response in analytical runs is crucial but lacks standardized methods. This study surveys European Bioanalysis Forum practices to recommend best approaches for managing IS response variability.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Bioanalysis
- Pharmaceutical Analysis
Background:
- Internal standard (IS) response monitoring is essential for analytical run integrity.
- Current practices for assessing IS response variability lack standardization across laboratories.
- The European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) identified a need for best practice guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey current practices for monitoring internal standard response variability within EBF member companies.
- To identify common challenges and approaches in managing IS response deviations.
- To recommend a standardized, best-practice approach for assessing IS response in bioanalytical runs.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to European Bioanalysis Forum member companies to gather data on their internal standard monitoring practices.
- Data analysis focused on identifying trends, common methodologies, and areas of divergence in IS response assessment.
- A topic team was formed to review survey results and formulate recommendations.
Main Results:
- Significant variation exists in the methodologies employed for monitoring internal standard response across different laboratories.
- Commonly identified anomalies in IS response include drifts, shifts, and outliers.
- A consensus emerged on the need for a more harmonized approach to IS response evaluation.
Conclusions:
- Standardized monitoring and assessment of internal standard response are critical for reliable bioanalytical data.
- The EBF recommends the adoption of a consistent, best-practice approach to manage IS response variability.
- Implementing these recommendations will enhance data quality and inter-laboratory reproducibility in bioanalysis.
More Related Videos
08:24Development and Standardization of an Ex Vivo Micromethod for Intracellular Quantification of Vincristine in Primary ALL Cells by LC-MS/MS
Published on: January 23, 2026
11:25Multi-step Preparation Technique to Recover Multiple Metabolite Compound Classes for In-depth and Informative Metabolomic Analysis
Published on: July 11, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...