Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

10:59
Visualizing and Quantifying Endonuclease-Based Site-Specific DNA Damage
Published on: August 21, 2021
4.2K
Targeting the DNA repair pathway in Ewing sarcoma.
Elizabeth Stewart1, Ross Goshorn1, Cori Bradley1
1Department of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Cell Reports
|December 2, 2014
Summary
Ewing sarcoma cells are sensitive to DNA repair inhibitors. Combining PARP inhibitors with irinotecan and temozolomide shows promise for treating this rare cancer.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Cancer Biology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is a rare bone and soft tissue cancer affecting young people.
- Current treatments offer a 70% survival rate for localized EWS, but metastatic or recurrent disease has a poor prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) in treating Ewing sarcoma.
- To evaluate combination therapies involving PARPis and DNA-damaging agents in an EWS mouse model.
Main Methods:
- EWS cell lines were tested for sensitivity to PARPis and DNA-damaging agents (irinotecan, temozolomide).
- An orthotopic EWS mouse model was used to assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PARPis.
- Combination treatments were administered to mice, and responses were evaluated.
Main Results:
- EWS cells exhibit DNA break repair defects and are sensitive to PARPis.
- PARPi-induced cytotoxicity was significantly enhanced by irinotecan or temozolomide.
- Combination therapy with PARPis and irinotecan (on a low-dose, protracted schedule) demonstrated superior tolerability and efficacy compared to temozolomide.
- Over 80% of mice in the combination treatment group achieved complete and durable responses.
Conclusions:
- PARPis represent a potential therapeutic strategy for Ewing sarcoma, particularly when combined with DNA-damaging agents.
- The combination of PARPis with irinotecan shows significant promise for treating EWS, offering durable responses in preclinical models.
- Further clinical investigation of this combination therapy is warranted for pediatric cancer patients with EWS.
Related Concept Videos
Nucleotide Excision Repair
6.0K
DNA Distortion and Damage
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
6.0K
Nucleotide Excision Repair
42.9K
Overview
42.9K
Nucleotide Excision Repair
14.1K
14.1K
Base Excision Repair
28.7K
One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
The first step of...
28.7K
Base Excision Repair
5.7K
5.7K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
8.4K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
8.4K

