Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Assessment of Dictyostelium discoideum Response to Acute Mechanical Stimulation
Published on: November 9, 2017
The directional response of chemotactic cells depends on a balance between cytoskeletal architecture and the external
Ming-Jie Wang1, Yulia Artemenko2, Wen-Jie Cai3
1Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China.
Abstract:
Polarized migrating cells display signal transduction events, such as activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and Scar/Wave, and respond more readily to chemotactic stimuli at the leading edge. We sought to determine the basis of this polarized sensitivity. Inhibiting actin polymerization leads to uniform sensitivity. However, when human neutrophils were "stalled" by simultaneously blocking actin and myosin dynamics, they maintained the gradient of responsiveness to chemoattractant and also displayed noise-driven PIP3 flashes on the basal membrane, localized toward the front. Thus, polarized sensitivity does not require migration or cytoskeletal dynamics. The threshold for response is correlated with the static F-actin distribution, but not cell shape or volume changes, membrane fluidity, or the preexisting distribution of PI3K. The kinetics of responses to temporal and spatial stimuli were consistent with the local excitation global inhibition model, but the overall direction of the response was biased by the internal axis of polarity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Chemotaxis and Direction of Cell Migration
Chemotaxis in E. coli
Cytoskeletal Coordination in Cell Migration
Cell Migration
Cell Migration
Cell Polarization by Rho Proteins

