Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray

699
The most common cardiovascular diagnostic test is an X-ray. It produces images of the heart, blood vessels, and adjacent structures.
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
699
X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

11.2K
German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with...
11.2K
Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

20.0K
All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...
20.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Infectious Causes of Acute Encephalopathy.

Neuroimaging clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Predictive value of brain tumor reporting and data system scores for functional outcomes and progression-free survival in glioblastoma.

Neuro-oncology advances·2026
Same author

Neurogenic irritable bowel syndrome? Long-term resolution of chronic gastrointestinal stress following vagus nerve microvascular decompression: illustrative case.

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons·2026
Same author

Adapting to New Multiple Sclerosis Diagnostic Standards in Imaging.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same author

Longitudinal Syringomyelia, Cervical Dystonia, and Action Tremor in Trichorhinophalangeal Syndrome Type I - A Case Report.

Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Predicting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Revision Risk: An Enhanced Machine Learning Analysis of the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2025
Same journal

Program signaling in the integrated interventional radiology residency match: A cross-sectional survey of program directors.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

ACR BI-RADS<sup>Ⓡ</sup> v2025: A summary of changes.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

Predominantly middle authors in radiology: a bibliometric assessment.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

Radiology's carbon footprint: Why environmental harm remains outside clinical responsibility.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

The imaging dilemma of solid serous cystadenomas, PNETs, and vascular pancreatic metastases: Challenges and diagnostic strategies.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

Awareness, discussion, and understanding of interventional radiology Procedures among non-interventional radiology medical providers on X: A social media infodemiology study.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

15.0K

Understanding and using fluoroscopic dose display information.

Brent D Weinberg1, Jeffrey B Guild1, Gary M Arbique1

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
|December 3, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding radiation dose in fluoroscopically guided procedures is key to patient safety. This study explains dose parameters like air kerma rate and cumulative air kerma to help physicians minimize radiation exposure.

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &#945; and &#946; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.9K
Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

15.0K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &#945; and &#946; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.9K
Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Physics
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Fluoroscopically guided procedures (FGPs) involve significant operator-dependent radiation exposure.
  • Modern fluoroscopy equipment displays complex dose information (e.g., air kerma rate, cumulative air kerma) that is often vendor-specific and poorly understood.
  • Physicians may lack awareness of how to interpret and utilize dose parameters to optimize radiation safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance physician understanding of radiation dose parameters displayed during fluoroscopy.
  • To provide a framework for interpreting dose readouts and correlating them with patient risk.
  • To promote the use of equipment features and techniques for minimizing radiation dose in FGPs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an analogy comparing fluoroscopy dose readouts to an automobile dashboard (dose rate as 'speed', cumulative dose as 'odometer').
  • Explained the measurement of air kerma at the reference point (RAK) and its correlation with skin dose.
  • Described differences in parameter display between fluoroscopy and fluorography modes.

Main Results:

  • The proposed analogy aids in understanding dose rate and cumulative dose.
  • Clarified the relationship between measured air kerma and actual patient skin dose.
  • Highlighted the importance of vendor-specific information interpretation for dose optimization.

Conclusions:

  • Increased physician awareness of dose parameters and their interpretation is critical for patient safety.
  • Effective use of fluoroscopic equipment features and techniques can significantly reduce patient radiation dose.
  • Optimizing radiation dose in FGPs directly translates to improved patient outcomes and reduced risk.