Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

8.9K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
8.9K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.6K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.6K
Goodness-of-Fit Test01:16

Goodness-of-Fit Test

9.5K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
9.5K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

4.2K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.2K
F Distribution01:19

F Distribution

11.1K
The F distribution was named after Sir Ronald Fisher, an English statistician. The F statistic is a ratio (a fraction) with two sets of degrees of freedom; one for the numerator and one for the denominator. The F distribution is derived from the Student's t distribution. The values of the F distribution are squares of the corresponding values of the t distribution. One-Way ANOVA expands the t test for comparing more than two groups. The scope of that derivation is beyond the level of this...
11.1K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

30.3K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
30.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimation of population-specific values of theta for PowerPlex Y23 profiles.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2024
Same author

Relevant propositions for Y chromosome interpretation.

Journal of forensic sciences·2024
Same author

Commentary on: Hahn M, Anslinger K, Eckert M, Fimmers R, Grethe S, Hohoff C, et al. [Joint recommendations of the project group "Biostatistical DNA Calculations" and the Trace Commission on the Biostatistical Evaluation of Forensic DNA Analytical Findings with Fully Continuous Models (FCM)]. Rechtsmedizin (Berl). 2023; 33(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s00194-022-00599-5.

Journal of forensic sciences·2023
Same author

Estimation of population specific values of theta for sequence-based STR profiles.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2023
Same author

Addressing uncertain assumptions in DNA evidence evaluation.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2023
Same author

Carrying out common DNA donor analysis using DBLR™ on two or five-cell mini-mixture subsamples for improved discrimination power in complex DNA mixtures.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2023
Same journal

Comparison of key diagnostics for probabilistic interpretation of STR mixture data generated with length-based and MPS methodologies.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Likelihood Ratios Given Activity-Level Propositions for DNA Transfer Evidence: Theoretical Foundations of the HaloGen Framework (Part I).

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Likelihood Ratios Given Activity-Level Propositions for DNA Transfer Evidence: Practical Implementation and Simulation Studies Using the HaloGen Engine (Part II).

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Forensic evaluation of 101 identity-informative SNPs in a Filipino population using massively parallel sequencing.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Reprocessing of hair roots using conventional forensic DNA analysis following RapidHIT® ID processing.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of low-input and degraded forensic DNA trace samples with NGS using the MiSeq FGx platform.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.3K

Efficient computations with the likelihood ratio distribution.

Maarten Kruijver1

  • 1Department of Mathematics, VU University, De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Forensic Science International. Genetics
|December 3, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Calculating the probability of a likelihood ratio exceeding a threshold is crucial for forensic genetics applications. This study introduces efficient simulation, a novel exact algorithm, and a hybrid approach for accurate exceedance probability computation.

Keywords:
Exact computationExceedance probabilityImportance samplingLikelihood ratioMonte CarloSimulation

More Related Videos

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.1K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.3K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.1K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Genetics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Determining the probability of a likelihood ratio exceeding a threshold is essential for forensic applications like kinship testing and familial searching.
  • Existing methods for calculating this probability, such as simulation, discrete approximation, and normal approximation, have limitations including computational intensity or providing only bounds.
  • Exact computation algorithms exist but are often computationally intensive for large datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel, efficient, and accurate methods for computing the exceedance probability of a likelihood ratio in forensic genetics.
  • To improve upon existing simulation techniques and exact computation algorithms for likelihood ratio threshold exceedance.

Main Methods:

  • Enhanced simulation using importance sampling for increased efficiency.
  • A novel, exact, and fast algorithm for computing exceedance probabilities.
  • A hybrid approach combining the novel algorithm with a discrete approximation for handling very large problems and providing bounds.

Main Results:

  • Importance sampling significantly improves the efficiency of simulation-based exceedance probability calculations.
  • The novel algorithm provides exact, fast computations for moderately large problems.
  • The hybrid approach effectively handles very large problems, yielding lower and upper bounds on the exceedance probability.

Conclusions:

  • The presented methods offer significant improvements in efficiency and accuracy for calculating likelihood ratio exceedance probabilities in forensic genetics.
  • These approaches are applicable to critical forensic tasks including kinship testing, familial searching, and mixture interpretation.
  • The developed algorithms are implemented in the freely available R-package DNAprofiles.