Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
Published on: May 20, 2018
The call, the save, and the threat: understanding expert help-seeking behavior during nonroutine operative scenarios
Richard J Novick1, Lorelei Lingard2, Sayra M Cristancho3
1Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and the Centre for Education Research and Innovation, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and the Centre for Education Research and Innovation, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Objective:
Asking for help in the operating room occurs within a surgical culture that has traditionally valued independence, decisiveness, and confidence. A tension exists between these deeply ingrained character traits and the new culture of team-based practice that emphasizes maximizing patient safety. The objective of this study is to explore surgeon-to-surgeon help-seeking behaviors during complex and unanticipated operative scenarios.
Study Design:
Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 14 consultant surgeons from multiple specialties. We used constructivist grounded theory to explore help-seeking experiences. Analysis occurred alongside and informed data collection. Themes were identified iteratively using constant comparisons.
Setting:
The setting included 3 separate hospital sites in a Canadian academic health sciences center.
Participants:
A total of 14 consultant surgeons from 3 separate departments and 7 divisions were included.
Results:
We developed the "Call-Save-Threat" framework to conceptualize the help-seeking phenomenon. Respondents highlighted both explicit and tacit reasons for calling for help; the former included technical assistance and help with decision making, and the latter included the need for moral support, "saving face," and "political cover." "The Save" included the provision of enhanced technical expertise, a broader intraoperative perspective, emotional support, and a learning experience. "The Threat" included potential downsides to calling, which may result in near-term or delayed negative consequences. These included giving up autonomy as primary surgeon, threats to a surgeon's image as a competent practitioner, and a failure to progress with respect to independent judgment and surgical abilities.
Conclusions:
Our "Call-Save-Threat" framework suggests that surgeons recurrently negotiate when and how to seek help in the interests of patient safety, while attending to the traditional cultural values of autonomy and decisive action. This has important implications for surgical postgraduate education and also throughout a surgeon's career trajectory.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Obedience
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...
Bystander Effect
The Availability Heuristic
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

