Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stochastic variables responsible for observed saccadic variability.

D M Westine, J D Enderle, E J Engelken

    Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation
    |January 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A model of the internal control system within the superior colliculus.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2001
    Same author

    Improving design project experiences through improved assessment practices.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2001
    Same author

    Multi-position eye movement detection system.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2001
    Same author

    Eye tracker.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2001
    Same author

    First year experience at the University of Connecticut with NSF design projects to aid persons with disabilities.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2001
    Same author

    Tele-talk: a communication device for the persons with hearing disabilities.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2001
    Same journal

    EFFECT OF FILTERING KINEMATICS ON FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS OF HEAD IMPACTS IN HIGH SCHOOL FEMALE LACROSSE.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
    Same journal

    INHIBITING THE INHIBITOR: WOULD TARGETING PAI-1 RESULT IN A LOW-DOSE, WELL-TOLERATED TREATMENT OF EMPYEMA?

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
    Same journal

    QUANTIFYING HEAD IMPACT EXPOSURE, MECHANISMS AND KINEMATICS USING INSTRUMENTED MOUTHGUARDS IN MALE HIGH SCHOOL LACROSSE.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
    Same journal

    UTILITY OF CHEST ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN QUANTIFYING CLOT AND PLEURAL EFFUSION VOLUME IN PRECLINICAL MODELS OF PLEURAL DISEASE.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
    Same journal

    THE ROLE OF PERIPHERAL VISION IN ENHANCING BALANCE AND POSTURAL STABILITY: INSIGHTS FROM CENTRAL VISION OBSTRUCTION.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2025
    Same journal

    IMPACT OF NON-SKID SOCKS AND ANTERIOR WEIGHT ON POSTURAL RESPONSE AND STABILITY DURING PERTURBATION.

    Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2025
    See all related articles

    This study introduces a new stochastic model of the horizontal saccadic system, demonstrating how random neural variables explain human saccade variability, including peak velocity and post-saccadic behaviors.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Computational Biology
    • Systems Neuroscience

    Background:

    • The horizontal saccadic system's neural control mechanisms remain incompletely understood.
    • Previous models have not fully captured the variability observed in human saccades.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and validate a stochastic local feedback model for the horizontal saccadic system.
    • To identify neural and muscular factors contributing to saccadic variability.

    Main Methods:

    • A computational model simulating neural control via burst, tonic, and pause cells was developed.
    • The model incorporated random variables affecting agonist burst cells, antagonist rebound bursts, and muscle saturation.
    • Simulated saccades were compared against human saccade data.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The stochastic model successfully replicated the variability observed in human saccade peak velocity, final position, and post-saccadic behaviors.
    • Random variations in agonist burst magnitude, antagonist rebound burst timing/magnitude, and muscle saturation were identified as key drivers of saccade variability.
    • The model accurately reproduced saccade trajectory profiles, velocity profiles, and dynamic/glissadic overshoots and undershoots.

    Conclusions:

    • Stochastic processes within the neural circuitry are crucial for explaining the variability in human horizontal saccades.
    • The model provides a framework for understanding the interplay between neural noise and motor output in the saccadic system.
    • This work advances the understanding of time-optimal neural control and its variability in the superior colliculus.