Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cohesin collisions maintain ordered nucleosome architecture at boundaries and promoters.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Motif grammar and transcriptional programs decouple CTCF binding from nucleosome phasing to control cell-type-specific chromatin insulation.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Chromatin architecture and physical constriction cooperate in phenotype switching and cancer cell dissemination.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A Targetable Developmental Program Coregulates Angiogenesis and Immune Evasion in Melanoma.

Cancer discovery·2026
Same author

Phasing single-molecule nano-NOMe-seq reveals chromatin state heterogeneity in the context of transcription and long-range interactions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Persistent chromatin alterations and gene expression reprogramming follow widespread DNA damage in glioblastoma.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
14:56

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics

Published on: April 6, 2019

33.8K

Taking a break from the lab: can it really be done?

Jane A Skok1

  • 1Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Trends in Cell Biology
|December 3, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Many scientists face career breaks, but returning to academia is possible. This study explores the challenges and successes of re-entering a scientific career after time away.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Eye Physiology Research via a Multi-Channel Flow Culture for Optimal Tissue Maintenance and Real-Time Assessment
06:26

Author Spotlight: Advancing Eye Physiology Research via a Multi-Channel Flow Culture for Optimal Tissue Maintenance and Real-Time Assessment

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.8K
Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices
08:53

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices

Published on: October 3, 2016

19.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
14:56

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics

Published on: April 6, 2019

33.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Eye Physiology Research via a Multi-Channel Flow Culture for Optimal Tissue Maintenance and Real-Time Assessment
06:26

Author Spotlight: Advancing Eye Physiology Research via a Multi-Channel Flow Culture for Optimal Tissue Maintenance and Real-Time Assessment

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.8K
Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices
08:53

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices

Published on: October 3, 2016

19.3K

Area of Science:

  • * Sociology of Science
  • * Academic Career Development

Background:

  • * The academic scientific career path is demanding, often perceived as linear and continuous.
  • * Obstacles can lead scientists to consider or take career breaks.
  • * The feasibility of returning to a successful academic career after a break is a significant concern.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To investigate the reasons behind career breaks taken by scientists.
  • * To examine the challenges encountered by scientists upon re-entry into academia.
  • * To determine the factors contributing to a successful return to an academic scientific career.

Main Methods:

  • * Qualitative study involving interviews with scientists who have taken career breaks.
  • * Analysis of career trajectories and perceived barriers to re-entry.
  • * Exploration of institutional support and personal strategies for career reintegration.

Main Results:

  • * Common reasons for breaks include family responsibilities, health issues, and pursuit of alternative careers.
  • * Re-entry challenges include outdated skills, research gaps, and difficulty securing funding or positions.
  • * Successful returns are often facilitated by strong mentorship, networking, and flexible institutional policies.

Conclusions:

  • * Career breaks are a reality for many scientists, influenced by diverse personal and professional factors.
  • * Returning to a successful academic career is achievable, though it requires strategic planning and support.
  • * Further research and institutional support are needed to facilitate seamless re-entry for scientists after breaks.