Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Preterm EEG: A Multimodal Neurophysiological Protocol
Published on: February 18, 2012
Motor development and sensory processing: A comparative study between preterm and term infants
Thais Invenção Cabral1, Louise Gracelli Pereira da Silva1, Eloisa Tudella1
1Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, São Carlos, SP CEP 13565-905, Brazil.
Insights
Preterm infants
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Development
- Infant Motor Skills
- Sensory Processing
Background:
- Preterm infants face developmental risks due to hospitalization and altered sensory environments.
- Early sensory integration and motor development are crucial for infant well-being.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess sensory processing and motor development in preterm infants (4-6 months).
- To compare preterm infants' performance with full-term peers.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional, comparative study.
- 15 preterm and 15 term infants.
- Utilized the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI) and Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS).
Main Results:
- No overall significant association between TSFI and AIMS total scores.
- Abnormal TSFI scores (total, subdomain 1, subdomain 5) correlated with AIMS performance at or below the 5th percentile.
Conclusions:
- Infants with tactile deep pressure or postural control issues may risk delayed gross motor development.
- Potential links between sensory processing and motor development warrant further investigation.
Abstract:
Infants born preterm and/or with low birth weight may present a clinical condition of organic instability and usually face a long period of hospitalization in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units, being exposed to biopsychosocial risk factors to their development due to decreased spontaneous movement and excessive sensory stimuli. This study assumes that there are relationships between the integration of sensory information of preterm infants, motor development and their subsequent effects.
Objective:
To evaluate the sensory processing and motor development in preterm infants aged 4-6 months and compare performance data with their peers born at term.
Method:
This was a cross-sectional and comparative study consisting of a group of preterm infants (n=15) and a group of term infants (n=15), assessed using the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI) and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS).
Results:
The results showed no significant association between motor performance on the AIMS scale (total score) and sensory processing in the TSFI (total score). However, all infants who scored abnormal in the total TSFI score, subdomain 1, and subdomain 5 presented motor performance at or below the 5th percentile on the AIMS scale.
Conclusion:
Since all infants who presented definite alteration in tolerating tactile deep pressure and poor postural control are at risk of delayed gross motor development, there may be peculiarities not detected by the tests used that seem to establish some relationship between sensory processing and motor development.
More Related Videos
09:24Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
11:31Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy of the Sensory and Motor Brain Regions with Simultaneous Kinematic and EMG Monitoring During Motor Tasks
Published on: December 5, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex....
Major Somatic Sensory Pathways
The Nativist Approach