Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Intra-Operative Behavioral Tasks in Awake Humans Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery
Published on: January 6, 2011
Sven Bestmann1, Archy O de Berker1, James Bonaiuto1
1Sobell Department for Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Abstract:
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) influences neural activity in a way that can elicit behavioural change but may also improve high-level cognition or ameliorate symptoms in neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the current fervour for tES contrasts with the paucity of mechanistically detailed models of how stimulation causes behavioural change. Here we challenge the plausibility of several common assumptions and interpretations of tES and discuss how to bridge the ravines separating our understanding of the behavioural and neural consequences of tES. We argue that rational application of tES should occur in tandem with computational neurostimulation and appropriate physiological and behavioural assays. This will aid appreciation of the limitations of tES and generate testable predictions of how tES expresses its effects on behaviour.

