Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.7K
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

2.7K
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
2.7K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.6K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.6K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

11.2K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
11.2K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

742
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
742
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blood Pressure Variability is Associated With Lower Cognitive Function: An Elderly Cohort Study in Hong Kong.

Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)·2026
Same author

Timing of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy Resumption Following Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2026
Same author

Affective dynamics in adolescents with major depressive disorder and subthreshold depression: an experience sampling study.

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Rest-activity rhythm across the clinical spectrum of depression among adolescents.

Journal of psychiatric research·2026
Same author

Real-world evidence of mammography screening from the Hong Kong Breast Cancer Registry: a cost minimisation analysis of 15 144 patients with breast cancer.

BMJ public health·2026
Same author

Multimorbidity and major adverse cardiovascular events in antipsychotic users: Time-to-event prediction by explainable machine learning.

iScience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

How often does an individual trial agree with its corresponding meta-analysis? A meta-epidemiologic study.

Wilson W S Tam1, Jin-Ling Tang2, Meng-yang Di3

  • 1Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore, Singapore.

Plos One
|December 5, 2014
PubMed
Summary

The first trial

More Related Videos

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

79.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

79.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Clinical trial analysis

Background:

  • Meta-analyses offer robust conclusions but involve significant waiting times and resource allocation.
  • Early trials, particularly the first, may provide timely insights, reducing delays in adopting effective interventions.
  • The reliability of early trial findings compared to comprehensive meta-analyses requires investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the concordance between the results of single clinical trials and their corresponding meta-analyses.
  • To determine the accuracy of the first trial's findings in predicting meta-analysis outcomes.
  • To inform strategies for reducing delays in clinical decision-making and intervention adoption.

Main Methods:

  • A meta-epidemiologic study analyzed 647 meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database and major medical journals.
  • Compared effect sizes of single trials (first, last, random) against their respective meta-analyses.
  • Evaluated statistical significance and direction of effect for concordance.

Main Results:

  • 36.0% of meta-analyses featured a statistically significant first trial.
  • When the first trial was significant, 84.1% of meta-analyses showed agreement in direction and significance.
  • When the first trial was insignificant, 57.9% of meta-analyses were also insignificant.

Conclusions:

  • The initial findings of a single trial, especially if statistically significant, often align with meta-analysis conclusions.
  • Statistically significant early trials are more reliable predictors of meta-analysis outcomes than larger trials.
  • Recommending interventions based on significant first trials may be justifiable in critical situations, potentially accelerating adoption by 5-8 years.