Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

82.3K
Overview
The basic structure of RNA consists of a five-carbon sugar and one of four nitrogenous bases. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA): messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three RNA types consist of a...
82.3K
RNA Structure01:19

RNA Structure

8.6K
The basic structure of RNA consists of a string of ribonucleotides attached by phosphodiester bonds. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA) involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three...
8.6K
RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

30.0K
30.0K
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

36.6K
Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
36.6K
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

12.2K
12.2K
Nucleic Acid Structure01:25

Nucleic Acid Structure

10.5K
The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms  a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA...
10.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MULGONET: An interpretable neural network framework to integrate multi-omics data for cancer recurrence prediction and biomarker discovery.

Fundamental research·2026
Same author

Establishing the Asia & Pacific Bioinformatics Joint Congress: a historic milestone in regional bioinformatics collaboration.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Utilizing Neurons to Interrogate Cancer: Integrative Analysis of Cancer Omics Data with Deep Learning Models.

IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

Editorial: The 21st Asian Pacific Bioinformatics Conference 2023.

Computational biology and chemistry·2024
Same author

Dual attention based fusion network for MCI Conversion Prediction.

Computers in biology and medicine·2024
Same author

Role of TAP1 in the identification of immune-hot tumor microenvironment and its prognostic significance for immunotherapeutic efficacy in gastric carcinoma.

Journal of gastrointestinal oncology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Nanomanipulation of Single RNA Molecules by Optical Tweezers
06:59

Nanomanipulation of Single RNA Molecules by Optical Tweezers

Published on: August 20, 2014

15.6K

Efficient conversion of RNA pseudoknots to knot-free structures using a graphical model.

Jimmy Ka Ho Chiu, Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen

    IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering
    |December 5, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary

    Computational RNA analysis is crucial for understanding RNA function. This study presents an efficient algorithm for pseudoknot removal in RNA secondary structures, improving computational tractability for complex analyses.

    More Related Videos

    RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
    13:42

    RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

    Published on: May 31, 2013

    32.5K
    Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
    10:34

    Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

    Published on: December 9, 2022

    5.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

    Nanomanipulation of Single RNA Molecules by Optical Tweezers
    06:59

    Nanomanipulation of Single RNA Molecules by Optical Tweezers

    Published on: August 20, 2014

    15.6K
    RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
    13:42

    RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

    Published on: May 31, 2013

    32.5K
    Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
    10:34

    Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

    Published on: December 9, 2022

    5.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Computational Biology
    • Bioinformatics
    • Molecular Biology

    Background:

    • RNA secondary structures dictate noncoding RNA 3-D structures and functions.
    • Computational RNA analysis aids in identifying functionally important motifs.
    • Pseudoknots in RNA structures pose significant computational challenges for analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop an efficient method for pseudoknot removal in RNA secondary structures.
    • To address the computational intractability of analyzing RNA structures with pseudoknots.
    • To improve the accuracy and efficiency of computational RNA structure analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Transformed the pseudoknot removal problem into a circle graph maximum weight independent set (MWIS) problem.
    • Extended an existing circle graph MWIS algorithm to report single or all solutions.
    • Introduced a novel structural scoring function for selecting optimal deknotted structures.

    Main Results:

    • The extended MWIS algorithm guarantees reporting one solution in polynomial time.
    • Experimental results show the algorithm is significantly more efficient than state-of-the-art tools.
    • The structural scoring function aids in more accurate selection of deknotted structure candidates.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed method provides an efficient and tractable approach to pseudoknot removal in RNA secondary structures.
    • This advancement enhances the capability of computational tools for analyzing complex RNA structures.
    • The developed algorithm and scoring function offer improved accuracy and efficiency in RNA bioinformatics.