Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Simultaneous ex vivo Functional Testing of Two Retinas by in vivo Electroretinogram System
Published on: May 6, 2015
Relationship between transient and steady-state pattern electroretinograms: theoretical and experimental assessment
Özcan Özdamar1, Jonathon Toft-Nielsen2, Jorge Bohórquez2
1University of Miami, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida, United States University of Miami, Departments of Otolaryngology, Pediatrics, and Neuroscience (Graduate), Miami, Florida, United States.
Steady-state pattern electroretinograms (PERG(SS)) are generated by overlapping transient (PERG(tr)) waveforms at specific rates. This explains how PERG(SS) responses are formed and their relationship to PERG(tr).
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neuroscience
- Visual Electrophysiology
Background:
- The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) is a key electrophysiological test used in ophthalmology.
- Distinguishing between transient (PERG(tr)) and steady-state (PERG(SS)) PERG responses is crucial for understanding retinal function.
- The relationship between PERG(tr) and PERG(SS) generation has not been fully elucidated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if the overlap of transient PERG (PERG(tr)) waveforms can explain the generation of steady-state PERG (PERG(SS)).
- To investigate the relationship between PERG(tr) and PERG(SS) responses.
- To analyze how different stimulation rates affect PERG generation and waveform characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Quasi steady-state (QSS) PERG(SS) responses were recorded from normal subjects using slightly jittered pattern reversals at various rates (6.9–26.5 reversals per second).
- Jittered QSS PERG(SS) were deconvolved using frequency domain continuous loop averaging deconvolution.
- Conventional PERG(tr) and PERG(SS) were recorded, and synthetic PERG(SS) responses were constructed and compared to recorded data.
Main Results:
- The study found that PERG(SS) at steady-state rates can be predicted by the superposition of deconvolved PERG(tr) waveforms at each specific rate.
- Conventional PERG(tr) accurately predicted PERG(SS) below 15.4 reversals per second (≥ 97% correlation).
- At higher rates (e.g., 26.5 rps), only deconvolved PERG(tr) from that specific rate could accurately predict the recorded PERG(SS) (96% vs. 65% correlation).
Conclusions:
- PERG(SS) is indeed generated by the overlapping of PERG(tr) waveforms occurring at the same reversal rate.
- The initial peaks of PERG(SS) (N(SS) and P(SS)) correspond to the N35 and P50 waves of PERG(tr).
- While the N95 amplitude is reduced at conventional steady-state rates, it still contributes to the overall PERG(SS) amplitude.
More Related Videos
06:34Using the Electroretinogram to Assess Function in the Rodent Retina and the Protective Effects of Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning
Published on: June 9, 2015
06:41Optimizing the Setup and Conditions for Ex Vivo Electroretinogram to Study Retina Function in Small and Large Eyes
Published on: June 27, 2022