Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Comparison of direct dynamics simulations with different electronic structure methods. F(-) + CH3I with MP2 and
Rui Sun1, Collin J Davda, Jiaxu Zhang
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409-1061, USA. bill.hase@ttu.edu.
Abstract:
In previous work, ion imaging experiments and direct chemical dynamics simulations with DFT/B97-1 were performed to study the atomic-level dynamics of the F(-) + CH3I → FCH3 + I(-) SN2 nucleophilic substitution reaction at different collision energies. Overall, the simulations are in quite good agreement with experiment at the low collision energy of 0.32 eV, however there are differences between experiment and simulation at the high collision energy of 1.53 eV. A recent CCSD(T) study of the potential energy surface for the F(-) + CH3I → FCH3 + I(-) SN2 reaction shows that it has both a traditional C3v and a hydrogen-bond entrance channel. They are represented by MP2 but not by B97-1, which has only the latter channel. On the other hand, B97-1 gives a reaction exothermicity in excellent agreement with experiment, while MP2 is in error by 24.3 kJ mol(-1). In the work presented here, direct dynamics simulations using MP2/aug-cc-pvdz/ECP/d were performed for the F(-) + CH3I → FCH3 + I(-) reaction at a 1.53 eV collision energy. The same direct rebound and stripping and indirect atomistic reaction mechanisms are found in the B97-1 and MP2 simulations. Both the B97-1 and MP2 simulations agree with the experimental fraction of the available product energy partitioned to CH3F internal energy, i.e. fint = 0.59 ± 0.08. However, the MP2 fint distribution is broader and in better agreement with experiment than B97-1. The two simulations methods give the same product energy partitioning for the stripping mechanism, but different partitionings for the rebound and indirect mechanisms. Compared to experiment, the principal difference between the B97-1 and MP2 results is the differential cross section which is nearly isotropic for B97-1. For MP2 backward scattering is more important than forward, as found in the experiments. Though there is no overall barrier for the reaction, B97-1 gives a reaction cross section appreciably larger than that for MP2, i.e. 8.6 ± 2.2 Å(2)versus 1.8 ± 0.3 Å(2). For B97-1 59% of the reaction consists of indirect mechanisms, while for MP2 the indirect mechanisms only comprise 11% of the reaction. The experimental differential cross section is more consistent with the atomistic mechanisms for MP2 than for B97-1.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
10:52Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
Published on: April 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Electronic Structure of Atoms
An atom comprises protons and neutrons, which are contained inside the dense, central core called the nucleus, with electrons present around the nucleus. Taking into account the wave–particle duality of electrons and the uncertainty in position around the nucleus, quantum mechanics provides a more accurate model for the atomic structure. It describes atomic orbitals as the regions around the nucleus where electrons of discrete energy exist, characterized by four quantum...
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments
Molecular Orbital Theory II
¹³C NMR: Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer (DEPT)
Calculations of Electric Potential II
Consider a...