Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Coronary anatomy, anatomic variations and anomalies: a retrospective coronary angiography study
Cihan Altin1, Suleyman Kanyilmaz1, Sahbender Koc1
1Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Başkent, Ankara, Turkey.
Insights
Coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) are uncommon but important anatomical variations. This study found absent left main coronary artery to be the most frequent CAA, and noted increased procedural risks associated with these variations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Anatomy
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) exhibit variable incidence (0.2%-8.4%).
- Understanding these variations is crucial for interventional cardiology procedures.
- This study aimed to determine local patterns of coronary dominance, intermediate artery (IMA) frequency, and CAA incidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence of coronary dominance patterns.
- To determine the frequency of the intermediate artery (IMA).
- To assess the incidence of coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) and compare findings with existing literature.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 5,548 coronary angiograms (CAG) from 2005-2009.
- Recorded coronary dominance, IMA presence, and CAA using two classification systems.
- Examined procedural details and clinical features of patients with CAAs.
Main Results:
- Right coronary artery dominance was observed in 81.6% of patients.
- Intermediate artery (IMA) was present in 11.0% of patients.
- Overall CAA incidence was 2.7% and 1.4% by classification; absent left main coronary artery was most common (0.9%).
Conclusions:
- Coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) are often asymptomatic but can lead to severe cardiac events.
- Patients with CAAs undergoing CAG experienced increased radiation and contrast exposure.
- Developing specialized catheters and training for ostial cannulation may mitigate risks.
Introduction:
The incidence of coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) varies from 0.2% to 8.4%. Knowledge of such anatomical variations is important as coronary procedures are regularly performed these days. We aimed to find the coronary dominance pattern, intermediate artery (IMA) frequency and CAA incidence in our clinic, and compare them to those in the literature.
Methods:
The medical reports of 5,548 patients who had undergone coronary angiography (CAG) between 2005 and 2009 were retrospectively investigated. Dominance pattern and presence of IMA and CAA were recorded. CAAs were described using two different classifications: Angelini and Khatami's classification, and a new modified classification that was derived from Angelini and Khatami's classification. Some procedural details and clinical features of the patients with CAA were also investigated.
Results:
Coronary dominance pattern was: 81.6% right coronary artery, 12.2% circumflex artery and 6.2% co-dominant. IMA was present in 613 (11.0%) patients. The incidences of overall anomaly were 2.7% and 1.4%, according to the different classifications. Absent left main coronary artery, which was the most common anomaly in the present study, was found in 51 (0.9%) patients. Incidences of myocardial bridge, coronary arteriovenous fistulae and aneurysms were 1.1%, 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively.
Conclusion:
CAAs are generally asymptomatic, isolated lesions. Some may lead to anginal symptoms, myocardial infarction or sudden death. We found that CAA was associated with increased radiation and contrast exposure in patients who underwent CAG. This risk could be reduced if appropriate catheters were designed and training programmes on ostial cannulation were developed.
More Related Videos
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
06:02Anatomical Reconstructions of the Human Cardiac Venous System using Contrast-computed Tomography of Perfusion-fixed Specimens
Published on: April 18, 2013