Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026
Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
Further Development and Validation of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale
Priscila M Caçola1, Carl Gabbard2, Maria I L Montebelo3
1P.M. Caçola, PhD, Developmental Motor Cognition Lab, Department of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 W Nedderman Dr, Arlington, TX 76019 (USA). cacola@uta.edu.
Background:
Affordances in the home environment may play a significant role in infant motor development.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to further develop and validate the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS), an inventory that measures the quantity and quality of motor affordances in the home.
Design:
A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate criteria for content validity, reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability of the instrument.
Methods:
A pilot version of the inventory with 5 dimensions was used for expert panel analysis and administered to parents of infants (N=419). Data were analyzed with Cronbach alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), ceiling and floor effects, and item and dimension interpretability analyses for creation of a scoring system with descriptive categories for each dimension and total score.
Results:
Average agreement among the expert panel was 95% across all evaluation criteria. Cronbach alpha values with the 41-item scale ranged between .639 and .824 for the separate dimensions, with a total value of .824 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]=.781, .862). The ICC values were .990 for interrater reliability and .949 for intrarater reliability. There was a ceiling effect on 3 questions for the Inside Space dimension and on 3 questions for the Variety of Stimulation dimension. These results demonstrated the need for reduction in total items (from 41 to 35) and the combination of space dimensions. After removal of questions, internal consistency was .766 (95% CI=.729, .800) for total score. Overall assessment categories were created as: less than adequate, moderately adequate, adequate, and excellent.
Limitations:
The inventory does not determine specific use (time, frequency) of affordances in the home, and it does not account for infants' out-of-home activities.
Conclusions:
The AHEMD-IS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess affordances in the home environment that promote infant motor development.
Related Concept Videos
01:14Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
01:29Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...