Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Left atrial appendage morphology in patients with atrial fibrillation in China: implications for stroke risk
1Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China; Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan, University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China.
Insights
Left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology and orifice diameter are significant predictors of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). These LAA parameters can help assess stroke risk in AF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Stroke Prevention
Background:
- The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a primary source of thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
- Understanding LAA characteristics is crucial for stroke risk stratification in AF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize LAA dimensions (orifice diameter, length) and morphology in Chinese patients with AF.
- To investigate the association between LAA parameters and a history of stroke in this population.
Main Methods:
- A study of 219 consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation.
- Utilized multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detailed LAA anatomical assessment.
Main Results:
- Common LAA morphologies included chicken wing (52.2%), windsock (23.9%), cauliflower (13.0%), and cactus (10.9%).
- Cactus morphology was associated with larger left atrial and LAA orifice diameters compared to windsock.
- Chicken wing morphology showed significantly greater LAA length than windsock and cauliflower.
- Prior stroke patients were older and had a higher prevalence of cauliflower and lower prevalence of chicken wing morphology.
- Multivariate analysis identified older age, non-chicken wing morphology, and larger LAA orifice diameter as independent predictors of stroke.
Conclusions:
- LAA morphology and dimensions are valuable indicators for stroke risk assessment in AF patients.
- This analysis can guide clinical decisions for stroke prevention strategies.
Background:
The left atrial appendage (LAA) is thought to be the main source of thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to describe the LAA orifice diameter, LAA length, and morphologic type of the LAA in Chinese patients with AF as well as to evaluate whether these LAA parameters are associated with a history of stroke in patients with AF from a single center in China.
Methods:
The study population consisted of 219 consecutive patients with drug-refractory, symptomatic paroxysmal, or persistent AF scheduled to undergo radiofrequency catheter ablation in our single center. All patients underwent extensive clinical assessment and multidetector computed tomography to fully explore the anatomy of the LAA.
Results:
Of the 219 patients who underwent catheter ablation procedures, chicken wing LAA morphology was found in 114 patients (52.2%), windsock in 52 (23.9%), cauliflower in 29 (13.0%), and cactus in 24 (10.9%). Compared with the windsock LAA morphology, cactus had a larger left atrial diameter ((42.40 ± 3.68) and (37.91 ± 4.32) mm, P = 0.005) and LAA orifice diameter ((27.38 ± 3.70) and (24.14 ± 3.58) mm, P = 0.048). The LAA length was significantly larger in the chicken wing morphology than in the windsock ((37.50 ± 6.74) and (31.33 ± 3.92) mm, P = 0.015) and cauliflower morphologies ((37.50 ± 6.74) and (31.33 ± 3.92) mm, P = 0.015). According to their medical records, 26 patients (11.9%) had suffered a prior stroke. Compared with patients who had no history of stroke, the prior-stroke patients were older (62.04 ± 8.07 and 58.24 ± 9.24, P = 0.047) and there were fewer patients with chicken wing (23.1% and 59.1%, P = 0.001) and more patients with cauliflower (26.9% and 9.8%, P = 0.046). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age (odds ratio (OR) 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.47; P = 0.003), non-chicken wing morphology (OR 5.82; 95% CI 1.61-21.03; P = 0.007), and LAA orifice diameter (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.05-1.49; P = 0.014) were independent predictors of stroke after adjusting for all parameters that emerged as potential confounders with univariate analysis.
Conclusion:
LAA analysis can potentially be used to inform guidance on the implication for stroke risk assessment.

