Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

620
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
620
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

25.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
25.2K
Operant Conditioning Intervention01:24

Operant Conditioning Intervention

688
Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
688
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

977
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
977
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.7K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.7K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

4.3K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Digestate biochar effects on soil Pb bioaccessibility, crop Pb concentrations, and human health risk in urban vegetable agroecosystems.

Environmental geochemistry and health·2026
Same author

Using oral bioaccessibility measurements to refine risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in topsoils across an urban area.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2024
Same author

Examining Predisposing Factors and Program Performance Indicators Associated With Program Completion: A Comparison of Opioid and Non-Opioid-Preferring Participants in Drug Court.

International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology·2019
Same author

Examining Individual Characteristics and Program Performance to Understand Two-Year Recidivism Rates Among Drug Court Participants: Comparing Graduates and Terminators.

International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology·2018
Same author

Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales.

Nature ecology & evolution·2017
Same author

Examining implementation and preliminary performance indicators of veterans treatment courts: The Kentucky experience.

Evaluation and program planning·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

3.2K

Implementation of an enhanced probation program: evaluating process and preliminary outcomes.

Lisa M Shannon1, Shelia K Hulbig1, Shira Birdwhistell1

  • 1Morehead State University, Sociology, Social Work, and Criminology, United States.

Evaluation and Program Planning
|December 30, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Kentucky's enhanced probation pilot program, Supervision, Monitoring, Accountability, Responsibility, and Treatment (SMART), significantly reduced probation violations, positive drug screens, and incarceration days for high-risk individuals.

Keywords:
CollaborationCommunity correctionsDeterrenceEnhanced probationEvaluation outcomesHigh-risk probationersHolistic approachInterpersonal communicationRehabilitation

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.9K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

3.2K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.9K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Criminology
  • Public Health
  • Social Work

Background:

  • High-risk probationers often face challenges with substance use and recidivism.
  • Traditional punitive approaches may not adequately address underlying issues.
  • Kentucky implemented the SMART program as an enhanced probation model.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the SMART enhanced probation pilot program.
  • To assess the impact of SMART on substance use, violations, and incarceration among high-risk probationers.
  • To explore stakeholder perceptions of program implementation and collaboration.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods evaluation combining qualitative interviews and quantitative analysis.
  • Qualitative interviews with key stakeholders including judges, attorneys, and law enforcement.
  • Quantitative analysis of secondary data from the Kentucky Offender Management System (KOMS).

Main Results:

  • SMART probationers had significantly fewer violations (1.2 vs. 2.3) and positive drug screens (8.6% vs. 29.4%) compared to control probationers.
  • SMART probationers experienced substantially less incarceration time (32.5 vs. 118.1 days).
  • Qualitative data indicated successful program implementation and collaboration among stakeholders.

Conclusions:

  • The SMART enhanced probation program demonstrates preliminary success in reducing recidivism and incarceration.
  • A holistic approach addressing substance use, mental health, and life skills is crucial for rehabilitation.
  • Findings suggest policy and practice implications for enhanced probation models.