Young femoral neck fractures: are we measuring outcomes that matter?

Sheila Sprague1, Gerard P Slobogean2, Taryn Scott3

  • 1Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Injury
|December 30, 2014
PubMed

Insights

Outcomes for young femoral neck fracture patients are poorly reported in studies using internal fixation. Future research must include functional outcomes and quality of life for better clinical practice guidance.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Traumatology
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Femoral neck fractures in young adults are devastating, with unique characteristics compared to elderly patients.
  • Geriatric hip fracture literature is not directly applicable to younger populations.
  • Internal fixation is a common treatment for femoral neck fractures in young adults.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review outcome measures in clinical studies of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures in patients aged 15-60.
  • To identify the extent to which clinically relevant outcomes are reported in this literature.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature search across multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings.
  • Inclusion of studies using internal fixation for femoral neck fractures in patients aged 15-60.
  • Duplicate screening and data abstraction, classifying outcomes into operative, radiographic, clinical, functional, and quality-of-life categories.

Main Results:

  • 42 studies met inclusion criteria; operative and hospital outcomes were poorly reported (<25%).
  • Radiographic outcomes, including fracture reduction quality, were inadequately reported (only 1/3rd).
  • Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life were reported in less than half of the studies (4.8%-45.2%).

Conclusions:

  • The assessment of clinically relevant outcomes in young femoral neck fracture literature is significantly lacking.
  • Current literature is challenging to utilize for guiding clinical practice in this patient group.
  • Future studies need to incorporate comprehensive radiographic, functional, and quality-of-life assessments.
Abstract