Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015
Standard and hypoosmolar corneal cross-linking in various pachymetry groups
Nienke Soeters1, Nayyirih G Tahzib
1*BOptom †MD, PhD, FEBOphth Utrecht Cornea Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (NS); and Zonnestraal Eye Hospital Amersfoort, Amersfoort, The Netherlands (NGT).
Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is safe and effective for progressive keratoconus, regardless of corneal thickness. Thinner corneas (≤460 μm) dehydrate faster during CXL than thicker ones, but outcomes remain comparable after one year.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Keratoconus is a progressive thinning disorder of the cornea.
- Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is a standard treatment to halt keratoconus progression.
- The influence of corneal thickness on CXL outcomes requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the efficacy and safety of CXL for progressive keratoconus.
- To compare outcomes between hypoosmolar and standard CXL based on preoperative CCT.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study involving 72 eyes with unilateral keratoconus treated with CXL.
- Eyes were grouped by CCT (Group 1: <400 μm, Group 2: 400-460 μm, Group 3: >460 μm) after riboflavin instillation.
- Outcomes including visual acuity, refraction, topography, pachymetry, and complications were assessed one year post-CXL.
Main Results:
- Corneal thickness decreased significantly in thinner corneas (<460 μm) and increased in thicker corneas (>460 μm) after riboflavin.
- Keratoconus progression was halted in over 86% of eyes across all groups.
- Visual acuity improved significantly in groups 1 and 3, with comparable safety and efficacy across all CCT groups.
Conclusions:
- Corneal thickness influences intraoperative CXL hydration dynamics but not 1-year outcomes.
- Both standard and hypoosmolar CXL demonstrate comparable safety and effectiveness in halting keratoconus progression.
- CXL is a reliable treatment option for progressive keratoconus across a range of corneal thicknesses.
More Related Videos
12:25Second Harmonic Generation Signals in Rabbit Sclera As a Tool for Evaluation of Therapeutic Tissue Cross-linking TXL for Myopia
Published on: January 6, 2018
05:56Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016