Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making
Martin P Ho1, Juan Marcos Gonzalez2, Herbert P Lerner3
1Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Building 66, Room 2232, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, USA. martin.ho@fda.hhs.gov.
Regulatory agencies now incorporate patient preferences for medical devices. This study quantifies patient tradeoffs between weight-loss device effectiveness and safety, informing FDA approval decisions.
Area of Science:
- Medical device regulation
- Patient-centered healthcare
- Health economics
Background:
- Patient preferences are crucial for medical device availability and regulatory approval.
- Regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) are increasingly considering patient input.
- This study is the first to gather quantitative patient-preference data for informing regulatory decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify patient preferences for attributes of weight-loss devices.
- To inform benefit-risk assessments for premarket approval of medical devices.
- To make regulatory decision-making more patient-centered.
Main Methods:
- A scientific survey of 540 US adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m².
- Discrete-choice experiments to evaluate tradeoffs between device effectiveness, safety, and other attributes.
- Development of a tool to estimate patient-acceptable weight loss and mortality risk.
Main Results:
- Patient preference scores were derived from choices, indicating the relative value of different device attributes.
- A tool was created to determine minimum acceptable weight loss for a given risk profile and maximum tolerable mortality risk for a given weight loss.
- For example, a risk-tolerant patient may accept a 0.01% mortality risk for approximately 10% total body weight loss over 5 years.
Conclusions:
- Patient preference evidence enhances regulatory decision-making, making it more patient-centered.
- The study captured patient preference heterogeneity, enabling market approval for effective devices for risk-tolerant individuals.
- The developed tool is used by CDRH to define minimum clinical effectiveness for new weight-loss devices, with potential application to other medical products.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Drug Regulation
Standards of Care II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact

