Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.3K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.3K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.8K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.8K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

797
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
797
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.9K
Self-Regulation01:25

Self-Regulation

345
Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...
345
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Theorizing ahead of the data: A commentary on Piper et al.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Neophobia and motivation in birds: A gene expression study informed by reinforcement sensitivity theory.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same author

To screen or not to screen? Critical reflections on the use of mental health screening in high-performance sport.

Psychology of sport and exercise·2026
Same author

Open science practices in behavioral addictions: An exploratory survey.

Journal of behavioral addictions·2026
Same author

Navigating the unknown: how exploratory traits shape juvenile post-fledging behaviour and survival in gulls.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Neural basis of attentional deployment in affective forecasting of hypothetical medication outcome trade-offs.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Configurational antecedents of employee green behavior: A mixed methods study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

The effects of counterfactual thinking on unilateral forgiveness: Can victims do it on their own?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Gray swan neglect: Do forecasters account for low(ish) probability events?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

An inductive learning intervention to improve news veracity discernment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Forgetting and blame: When cognitive lapses excuse and when they backfire.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Predecisional distortion of risk information seen in icon arrays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

8.0K

How does response inhibition influence decision making when gambling?

Tobias Stevens1, Damien Brevers2, Christopher D Chambers3

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Exeter.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|January 7, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Response inhibition training, by introducing stop signals, reduces gambling bets. This effect is reliable but small, influencing approach behavior and the motivation behind gambling decisions.

More Related Videos

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.2K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

8.0K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.2K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Response inhibition is crucial for regulating behavior, impacting impulsive and compulsive actions.
  • Previous studies indicate that response inhibition training can modify gambling behavior, leading to more cautious choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the direct influence of stopping motor responses on gambling preferences.
  • To determine the mechanisms underlying the effect of response inhibition on gambling decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a gambling task incorporating stop signals to assess betting behavior.
  • Conducted multiple experiments varying task demands, participant instructions, and task types.
  • Analyzed information sampling, arousal levels, and generalized effects across populations and tasks.

Main Results:

  • Introducing stop signals led to a reliable, albeit small, reduction in gambling bets.
  • This effect was not attributable to changes in information sampling or arousal.
  • The influence on gambling preferences was observed when participants occasionally had to stop a response, but not when accuracy was prioritized.

Conclusions:

  • Stopping motor responses influences gambling by reducing approach behavior.
  • The presence of stop signals alters the motivational value of gambling outcomes.
  • Findings suggest response inhibition is a key factor in modulating gambling decisions.